WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.1K

I thought they were different crimes and the DA had to pick one to prosecute.

I thought they were different crimes and the DA had to pick one to prosecute.

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts (edited )

What would stop the law from engaging in 40 jeopardy by rewriting a law with slight variation 40 times, for which if any one is applicable than probably the majority are applicable and hearing the same matter 40 times until they run out of nearly duplicate laws?

Hate speech while wearing a shirt. Hate speech while wearing pants. Hate speech from the hours of 1am to 11pm. Hate speech from the hours of 2am to 12am. Hate speech from the hours of 3am to 1am the following day. Hate speech from 1:23am to 11:56pm. Hate speech from 1:23am to 11:55pm.

[–] 2 pts

Nothing. That's the idea though. They want the discretion to destroy lives or offer salvation (for the right price). The concept is called charge stacking, and fortunately most state legislators have been reasonable so far. They will add layers of laws against white people soon though.