Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

663

Examine the hysterical responses to things like the run on massive quantities of toilet paper. Men do not use that much TP, this is a female response to being unable to wipe their front holes. Albeit, a determined response to a loss of manufacturing capacity to create more toilet paper.

Examine the following article that would have you believe that women care more for their well-being than men do. http://archive.today/jACSq A brainwashing tactic (on men) at the least. According to the latter drivel;

men worldwide have been far more likely to die from COVID-19 — because of a mix of biological and behavioral factors — but also less likely to have been vaccinated against the disease.

Not only is it a push to destroy men, it is a refusal to acknowledge the inherently hysterical nature of the female. A choice of the female to accept a policy with gene altering affects--without questioning the narrative they have been given.

Clearly, this is to push men into accepting bullshit that they know is a manufactured lie. Men are not easily persuaded into things until they see them with their own two eyes. Hard evidence is a reality for men. They do not; "go with the trends." Female nature is to accept things at face value based on group think. Go with what the leader of the tribe tells you, or be banished (and condemned to death). It is a hard wired evolutionary response to their authority figure; "Big Daddy Government." Men are no longer women's authority figures, it is those who guarantee them they will fix all their problems--no matter how fucked up they are.

Examine the hysterical responses to things like the run on massive quantities of toilet paper. Men do not use that much TP, this is a female response to being unable to wipe their front holes. Albeit, a determined response to a loss of manufacturing capacity to create more toilet paper. Examine the following article that would have you believe that women care more for their well-being than men do. http://archive.today/jACSq A brainwashing tactic (on men) at the least. According to the latter drivel; ``men worldwide have been far more likely to die from COVID-19 — because of a mix of biological and behavioral factors — but also less likely to have been vaccinated against the disease.`` Not only is it a push to destroy men, it is a refusal to acknowledge the inherently hysterical nature of the female. A choice of the female to accept a policy with gene altering affects--without questioning the narrative they have been given. Clearly, this is to push men into accepting bullshit that they know is a manufactured lie. Men are not easily persuaded into things until they see them with their own two eyes. Hard evidence is a reality for men. They do not; "go with the trends." Female nature is to accept things at face value based on group think. Go with what the leader of the tribe tells you, or be banished (and condemned to death). It is a hard wired evolutionary response to their authority figure; "Big Daddy Government." Men are no longer women's authority figures, it is those who guarantee them they will fix all their problems--no matter how fucked up they are.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (86).
[–] • 14 pts

Women are genetically programmed to want to think about everyone in their group and to make sure everybody gets their share. This plays right into Marxist ideologies and since it appears to be 'right and moral' it is very difficult to argue against. The end game here is equality of outcomes AKA socialism. But we've already done the socialism game, several times in fact and EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. has resulted in societal collapse, and wide spread starvation and death. Something like 120 million in the 20th century.

Yet we keep electing women. Stupid. Fucking stupid.

Don't get me started on women in policing and the military.

[–] • 7 pts

National socialism took a country out of an extra bad great depression and fixed the weimar degeneracy.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Wasn't that more a social message and less an economic model? A "put your race and your homeland first," message not a "we take all the stuff and give you the scraps," plan.

[–] • 5 pts

It's not that we keep electing women, it's that certain fucks are rigging it so it's as such.

[–] • 4 pts

I think I can agree with some of that as a woman. In leadership roles we value fairness and are the last to give up on people with skill issues. If we elected more systems-thinking and analytical types of women this would be a non-issue, but instead we elect emotional retards and wonder why nothing gets done.

[–] • 5 pts

Thanks for your even handed reply. My intention is not to come across as anti-women, but sometimes that's how it appears.

Clearly there have been good female politicians, just as clearly there are roles in the police and military for women. But the attitude "a chick is better than a white male every time" is poison. Gender roles are real and what's more they exist for a reason. People should play to their strengths even if sometimes it means you don't get to be an astronaut.