WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

767

Is the block user feature working as intended? A user recently blocked me and now it will not let me reply to any of their comments. It is understandable for them to be able to hide any replies/posts on their end, but it appears that it prevents the post from going through at all.

If this is how this is intended to work I see this as a huge violation of free speech. If not, then it's not working as intended.

Is the block user feature working as intended? A user recently blocked me and now it will not let me reply to any of their comments. It is understandable for them to be able to hide any replies/posts on their end, but it appears that it prevents the post from going through at all. If this is how this is intended to work I see this as a huge violation of free speech. If not, then it's not working as intended.

(post is archived)

That's how the block used to work. I'm fine with that, but not allowing them to discuss your comment with others is overstepping, imo.

The big problem with the block feature is that once you block someone, they can still post in your subs and then you can't moderate them or are forced to by expanding their comments anyway. Need a block that's global.

Anyone can start a new threat for discussion.

I've also brought that up too, but not much response on that one. We will have to keep being a nuisance in and about it. The posts shouldn't be hid from mods.

[–] -1 pt

Go to reddit you sensitive kikenigger. What kind of pussy are you? This a is a free speech site just ignore negative trolls and move on we don't want to become reddit.2.0 stop being a little bitch

free speech doesn't mean act retarded, you go to reddit

[–] 0 pt

but not allowing them to discuss your comment with others is overstepping, imo.

You are wrong.

https://poal.co/s/Poaldev/327789

I know red baron users can do it, but I don't understand why there has to be a level attached to it. There seems to be no logical reason why anyone should be limited to discussing with other users under a thread.

[–] 0 pt

Due to abuse from new users

What is it that you don't understand in that sentence?