WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.4K

Is the block user feature working as intended? A user recently blocked me and now it will not let me reply to any of their comments. It is understandable for them to be able to hide any replies/posts on their end, but it appears that it prevents the post from going through at all.

If this is how this is intended to work I see this as a huge violation of free speech. If not, then it's not working as intended.

Is the block user feature working as intended? A user recently blocked me and now it will not let me reply to any of their comments. It is understandable for them to be able to hide any replies/posts on their end, but it appears that it prevents the post from going through at all. If this is how this is intended to work I see this as a huge violation of free speech. If not, then it's not working as intended.

(post is archived)

It's not that I don't understand it, it's that I think it's not a solution for the stated problem.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the following seems like the natural workaround for the rule....

  1. User A creates a new account to troll
  2. User B blocks them
  3. User A creates a new account to chat under User B's posts

What 'new user' problem did you solve?

[–] 0 pt

It's not that I don't understand it,

it's that I think it's not a solution for the stated problem.

What 'new user' problem did you solve?

If you have to ask such question, you then don't understand how poal works (deal with alts).

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

You're right... no one does except you and boobs.

Regardless, unless you are restricting users to only one account (and tracking that) this solution absolutely does not solve the stated problem assuming a user isn't gaming the voting* system.

[–] 0 pt

this solution absolutely does not solve the stated problem assuming a user isn't gaming the system.

Why are you doubling down? Alt accounts are permitted as long as they aren't used to target specific users or game votes.