That is a totally speculative estimate for the number of people someone can keep track of personally but it in no way indicates the number of people a successful nation is limited to.
You certainly cant limit your breeding population to that number. You wont have a very wealthy or knowledgeable society if you limit it to 150 people either.
I dont think this society is normal anymore since we let jews take it over and try to incorporate people from every race into it but I do think that a well regulated society can sustain between 10 and 100 million people easily. Maybe a billion or more. It all depends on how culturally and genetically homogeneous it is.
That is a totally speculative estimate for the number of people someone can keep track of
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar%27s_number
Society
Mankind is a tribal species. Dunbar's number indicates the upper limit of how large a functional tribe can be. My guess is, that if a tribe grows larger, things become dysfunctional start getting open to subversion, among other things.
Besides, I think that what you call subversion, is society as it normally functions. It's been consistently on this path for more than 2000 years. Thinking that the present is something special probably is normal, but it's a bias. The tendency to breed a domesticated slave-population via racemixing and brainwashing has been there from the very beginning of civilization, and so has the strife for more and more control and power of those who are in charge, and so has the control of the money-system, and basically everything you call kikery. Heck the whole christian fucking religion is a nothing but a branch of kikery, so the whole spiritual basis of this society has been invented by kikes.
(post is archived)