That's the funny thing about juries: they can vote however they want, regardless of the evidence. The good news is that if even one of them refuses to convict, it's over for the prosecution. They're not going to do that, though. They're going to 'compromise' by convicting him of something that results in jail time.
It's funny how all these people who allegedly want justice reform don't want real reform to prevent the government from charging you with multiple crimes for one act. Double jeopardy is supposed to prevent this, but a slimy jew interpretation of the Constitution changed the meaning from:
nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb
to
nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice be charged with that offense
That's the funny thing about juries: they can vote however they want
Yup. Jury nullification is a thing.
Not counting on a Minneapolis jury with a Minneapolis prosecutor armed with a handful of peremptory challenges having anybody on it willing to engage in such activity.
(post is archived)