So why aren't we setting up something based on the concept of crowdsouring loans? I can't think of a firearm owner that wouldn't be down to invest in some additional manufacturing capacity.
What if the local government won’t grant you a local business license? (And courts support it?)
What if they charge you a tax you can’t afford and stay in business. (And courts support it?)
What if they just sue you with frivolous lawsuits they can’t win, but it doesn’t matter because they have deep pockets? (And courts support it?)
What if they force the crowdsourcing site to cancel your account? (And courts support it?)
Should I go on? These are all tactics our current government allows.
There are plenty of places that will be happy to have such a facility.
If someone sets up crowdfunding that isn't stupid enough to use jewy infrastructure they'll be ok.
And then suddenly the BaseBall All Star Game is changed from their capital and they lose 100 million dollars in revenue. Just an example of what happens when you go against the narrative. Watch how those plenty of places that will be happy to have such a facility change over night.
I would gladly invest in something like that but, me in my garage with an ammo press is the only hint I’m sure hat is free of a “jewy infrastructure” my mortgage is suspect, but I owe no money to any banks.
An organization that crowdsources loans and pays out profits to those providing the capital for those loans is called a bank. That's a tightly sealed group of people colluding to keep others from doing just what you suggest.
(post is archived)