Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.4K

I've changed my mind about hating this April 1st (and continuing) shake up of usernames. I sometimes exercise caution towards a post because of who the user is, whether because I like them (positive) or because I think they are a lunatic (negative). For a short time, we get to see some true opinions based not upon who the messenger is, but because of their content. It should be interesting to go back and see who we responded to and who responded to us.

Anyone agree with this sentiment?

Also, I had to eventually make a question since this is "AskPoal." I don't know the correct subverse to just make a meta observation about Poal.

I've changed my mind about hating this April 1st (and continuing) shake up of usernames. I sometimes exercise caution towards a post because of who the user is, whether because I like them (positive) or because I think they are a lunatic (negative). For a short time, we get to see some true opinions based not upon who the messenger is, but because of their content. It should be interesting to go back and see who we responded to and who responded to us. Anyone agree with this sentiment? Also, I had to eventually make a question since this is "AskPoal." I don't know the correct subverse to just make a meta observation about Poal.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (29).
[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

IDGAF if you are tied to your identity here you are the worst faggot on poal.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Right? What's with people complaining about not being able to "communicate" or "follow up" on who's who? These whiny faggots acting like poal is stealing their super secret cells of resistants, topkek. You're not doing shit worth networking here guys.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Holy shit did that make me laugh! I am a winner on something! LAWRZ!

E: You get an upgoat, LAWRZ, I am still laughing.