Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

966

I've changed my mind about hating this April 1st (and continuing) shake up of usernames. I sometimes exercise caution towards a post because of who the user is, whether because I like them (positive) or because I think they are a lunatic (negative). For a short time, we get to see some true opinions based not upon who the messenger is, but because of their content. It should be interesting to go back and see who we responded to and who responded to us.

Anyone agree with this sentiment?

Also, I had to eventually make a question since this is "AskPoal." I don't know the correct subverse to just make a meta observation about Poal.

I've changed my mind about hating this April 1st (and continuing) shake up of usernames. I sometimes exercise caution towards a post because of who the user is, whether because I like them (positive) or because I think they are a lunatic (negative). For a short time, we get to see some true opinions based not upon who the messenger is, but because of their content. It should be interesting to go back and see who we responded to and who responded to us. Anyone agree with this sentiment? Also, I had to eventually make a question since this is "AskPoal." I don't know the correct subverse to just make a meta observation about Poal.

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

It's no longer funny.

[–] • 3 pts

I thought it would be done midnight April 2nd. Yeah, I am with you on that.

It needs to stop.

[–] • 1 pt

Has it been funny then?

[–] • 0 pt

I thought it appropriate for April 1st.

Ha ha. Good one.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Really don't give a shit about who responded to me. Only faggots run back to find out.

[–] • 0 pt

Well, that is one way of looking at it. I do care. I care about discussion as opposed to mindlessly yelling at folks.

Meh, whatever. I believe I am right (I could be wrong).

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

NICE TRY, AOU! Now roll the code back.

Also, .

[–] • 0 pt

Thanks for the subverse. I agree it must stop soon.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

when you see the same users pushing various ideas that converge upon inciting anxiety and rage, misinfo, etc then what else they write can be put under suspect.

with anon users it masks shills better.

e, who am i?

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Agreed. It still is a nice short term exercise. That's my point.

E: Short term.

E2:

e, who am i?

No clue. Folks I talk to on here know how to capitalize correctly You are deceiving me, haha! You set me up, bitch!

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

its pushthis.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Only think I can thing as ... fuck if I know ...

E: White video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1fzJ_AYajA

[–] • 1 pt

I don't like it, stealing identities it is. If it continues like this you will not see me here anymore.

[–] • 0 pt

100% agree. It needs to stop. I suspect it will. I just liked it as an exercise.

I do believe that was the first comment I made, something like, "I'm out of here because of this bullshit." Then I thought about it.

Voat.xyz! Goats must organize!

E: We can do both, right? Mehheheeh!

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

its is interesting in regards to the voat influx only voting for other voatees. Might not see so many memes on the front page.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

I'm a goat (meeheheheh). I am fairly certain we behave just like you folks. We considered mostly everyone on Voat as a jew shill or some three-letter alphabet soup, honey pot trapper. We sure as fuck do not stand together based upon the former website (E: meaning just because someone was from Voat that we show them favoritism; I assure you there are nicknames from Voat that I despise on here).

E: Well, except when Poal trashes Voat, then yeah, we band together. You got me on that part. E2: And deservedly so! Mehheheheheh!

E3: (I must stop with the fucking edits.)

Might not see so many memes on the front page.

Has the front page content changed since the name shake up (April 1st) in your opinion? If not, your argument is specious, since we cannot tell a fellow goat (well, except by the content, but I suppose that is not your argument). If it is the (non-specific goat) content, than it isn't about the camaraderie of goats, is it?

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

IDGAF if you are tied to your identity here you are the worst faggot on poal.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Right? What's with people complaining about not being able to "communicate" or "follow up" on who's who? These whiny faggots acting like poal is stealing their super secret cells of resistants, topkek. You're not doing shit worth networking here guys.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Holy shit did that make me laugh! I am a winner on something! LAWRZ!

E: You get an upgoat, LAWRZ, I am still laughing.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

I normally attempt to stay respectful in my communications here but I did enjoy making shit posts and maybe aggravating a few users here. Glad to get it out of my system.

[–] • 0 pt

We all need a release. I sure as fuck do.

[–] • 1 pt

Anons are truly anons.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

This is oddly familiar.

Use some excuse to shake up the status quo. Everyone sort of accepts it considering the valid excuse. Then it stays that way almost indefinitely with no end in sight.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Are you trying to say something of import?

E: Get it out, I know you can do it!

E2: Stop dancing like a pussy. Did I hear you say, "Let's kill all the jews." I think that is what I heard you say. I agree!

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

I prefer to have whoever reads it come to their own conclusion through their own volition.

Here's the nugget of import. When someone else tells you what's true, you only half believe it. When you convince yourself what's true, it's almost unshakable.

Load more (1 reply)