Unfortunately, I don't think he'll be acquitted. I don't want to black pill and be pessimistic, but it's just not looking good for him. The jury is made up of 6 white women, 3 black men, 2 mongrel women (probably mixed niggers), 3 white men, and 1 sheboon. 9 women, 6 men. The jury also skews younger, i.e. potentially more liberal. This is what an unfair trial looks like. His best bet is for the white men to cause a hung jury.
Some more info on each juror: https://archive.is/Xwlcr
Every single one has openly stated during the selection process that they have both a negative opinion of Chauvin and a positive opinion of BLM. This is the epitome of an unfair trial.
Isn't that grounds for tossing out the jury by stating their personal views before the case happens?
They were probably asked their opinion on each subject. Everyone knows of George Floyd and Derek Chauvin. Everyone knows about BLM. Everyone has an opinion. The best they could have done was to find a balance, but they decided against that apparently.
Agreed. Real question is probably what will people do when he's found guilty and the judge throws the book at him.
(post is archived)