![Q people are going to wet their pants over this. Look at what it deciphers to. I put a link in the comment [585x375 - 38KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/D7qI4A.png){kind=link}
Think about what you've just said.
My point is that normal trolling, you just get banned from twitter. Pushing Q stuff on an official stratcom twitter acct, possible terrorism charge. And if you were going to cross that line, there's a lot worse that could've been posted anyway.
Do you expect US Strategic Command to admit they've been hacked, or that a rogue employee got ahold of their twitter account?
I would expect them to offer an explanation that doesn't fuel the Q shit.
How about this explanation: One of them forgot to switch twitter accounts? Might still be a Q troll, just not intending to post on that account.
You're right, another possibility. My question is, why give them the benefit of the doubt? Why would I just go about my day without an answer? If I know that psyops operate under the principle of plausible deniability, I am going to assume it was purposeful until proven otherwise. Honestly, I don't understand why we hold the gov't to such a loose fucking standard. There should be people DEMANDING an answer from Stratcom over this, and instead people are making memes. Make them prove this is nothing to worry about and you take a step in resisting propaganda.
My goal is to ascertain the truth, which means considering all of the possibilities and ranking them in order of probability. Your approach isn't to find the truth but to push a narrative.
As for DEMANDING they provider an answer, good luck. I doubt you have the power to MAKE them do anything.
(post is archived)