One thing, I DON'T think this is a joke of any sort. This was political, regardless the source of the post. Q is WAY too volatile of a subject. Considering how they're going after people in the Jan 6th, and people in the gov't and media are trying to connect it to Q, the gov't definitely doesn't see it as a joke.
You just said that a troll, a hacker or a rogue employee wouldn't tweet it because Q is too volatile of a subject. Think about what you've just said.
Look at the response stratcom made: "Apologizes for any confusion. Please disregard this post". They didn't say they were hacked, or offer a reasonable explanation. They want people to make their theories. It's a psyop.
Do you expect US Strategic Command to admit they've been hacked, or that a rogue employee got ahold of their twitter account?
Think about what you've just said.
My point is that normal trolling, you just get banned from twitter. Pushing Q stuff on an official stratcom twitter acct, possible terrorism charge. And if you were going to cross that line, there's a lot worse that could've been posted anyway.
Do you expect US Strategic Command to admit they've been hacked, or that a rogue employee got ahold of their twitter account?
I would expect them to offer an explanation that doesn't fuel the Q shit.
How about this explanation: One of them forgot to switch twitter accounts? Might still be a Q troll, just not intending to post on that account.
You're right, another possibility. My question is, why give them the benefit of the doubt? Why would I just go about my day without an answer? If I know that psyops operate under the principle of plausible deniability, I am going to assume it was purposeful until proven otherwise. Honestly, I don't understand why we hold the gov't to such a loose fucking standard. There should be people DEMANDING an answer from Stratcom over this, and instead people are making memes. Make them prove this is nothing to worry about and you take a step in resisting propaganda.
(post is archived)