what about the shadow the earth casts on the moon and is clearly visible with your own naked eyes?
I have a problem with that “shadow” because never in a million years could you replicate that in real life. No matter the source to image distance (distance between light and shadowing object, or earth and sun) you will never get a larger object projecting a curved shadow like that on a smaller object like the moon. It would always just look like a straight line. It would not be such a curved line that it would result in a “gibbous” moon or whatever.
there is no straight line, and there is no curved line.
the fact that you got both these things wrong proves that you havent even made that observation yourself is definite proof that you arent actually researching the topic yourself.
you dont try to prove your theory right.
you just try to win arguments on the internet.
if you want to know, do a simple experiment: take long exposure fots of the night sky in three different locations one further north, one close to the equator and another further south.
the patterns of movement in the sky can be made by no other constellation that that of a spherical earth revolving around the sun.
that is easy enough to do, you dont even need to go to any extremes in distance, or cross the equator. if your triangulation skills are sufficient, you only need two photos 200 miles apart to be able to calculate the dircumference of the earth yourself.
=)
Got you nigger
=)
Lol yeah you really “got me” with a bullshit “experiment” that you haven’t even done, without even explaining how it’s supposed to prove whatever your point even is.
(post is archived)