Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

852

I've been in the eugenics camp for quite some time, but this policy isn't necessarily "eugenic" because a lot of these people are genetic dead ends regardless. No girl is going to fuck a dude with cerebral palsy, for example.

Watch the beginning of this video:

https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnewsvideo/comments/m8zmjm/driver_gets_emotional_when_he_sees_how_his/

Most of the faggots on Reddit are tearing up, but I'm sitting here perplexed by a society that would foist such a limited and partial existence on a person who would be better off dead, and who we would be better off with dead. We're partway there; we pull life support on those in vegetative states, absent of any brain function other than that which keeps their bodies alive.

Consider . We, as an enlightened and scientifically-informed civilization, believe that it is more compassionate and humane to keep children like this alive. There are drooling, catatonic individuals in institutions that we keep alive from that same misplaced sense of compassion.

And on a different note, we keep old men and women who are completely invalid, emaciated, and dependent on others to shit, piss, show, eat, etc. We are so death-averse that we'd much rather have people endure their hellish existence than allow them to achieve the most enduring peace that is death.

I've been in the eugenics camp for quite some time, but this policy isn't necessarily "eugenic" because a lot of these people are genetic dead ends regardless. No girl is going to fuck a dude with cerebral palsy, for example. Watch the beginning of this video: https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnewsvideo/comments/m8zmjm/driver_gets_emotional_when_he_sees_how_his/ Most of the faggots on Reddit are tearing up, but I'm sitting here perplexed by a society that would foist such a limited and partial existence on a person who would be better off dead, and who we would be better off with dead. We're partway there; we pull life support on those in vegetative states, absent of any brain function other than that which keeps their bodies alive. Consider [these children](https://files.catbox.moe/qzqjuz.WEBP). We, as an enlightened and scientifically-informed civilization, believe that it is more compassionate and humane to keep children like this alive. There are drooling, catatonic individuals in institutions that we keep alive from that same misplaced sense of compassion. And on a different note, we keep old men and women who are completely invalid, emaciated, and dependent on others to shit, piss, show, eat, etc. We are so death-averse that we'd much rather have people endure their hellish existence than allow them to achieve the most enduring peace that is death.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (35).
[–] • 1 pt

Agreed. The only ones of our kind that get euthanized are the race traitors. All white lives have value or none do.

[–] • 1 pt

First:

The only ones of our kind that get euthanized are the race traitors.

Then:

All white lives have value or none do.

I wonder if the contradiction even registered in your mind. So if value means deserving of life, then your willingness to execute white race traitors suggests that you don't think ALL white life matter or are deserving of life. I agree. I agree: not all white lives matter, unless you mean to spare white rapists, white pedophiles, white zoophiles, white serial killers, white homosexuals, white transvestites, white degenerates, etc.

Is that what you desire? Or are you capable of admitting that there are exceptions?