Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.1K

I've been in the eugenics camp for quite some time, but this policy isn't necessarily "eugenic" because a lot of these people are genetic dead ends regardless. No girl is going to fuck a dude with cerebral palsy, for example.

Watch the beginning of this video:

https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnewsvideo/comments/m8zmjm/driver_gets_emotional_when_he_sees_how_his/

Most of the faggots on Reddit are tearing up, but I'm sitting here perplexed by a society that would foist such a limited and partial existence on a person who would be better off dead, and who we would be better off with dead. We're partway there; we pull life support on those in vegetative states, absent of any brain function other than that which keeps their bodies alive.

Consider . We, as an enlightened and scientifically-informed civilization, believe that it is more compassionate and humane to keep children like this alive. There are drooling, catatonic individuals in institutions that we keep alive from that same misplaced sense of compassion.

And on a different note, we keep old men and women who are completely invalid, emaciated, and dependent on others to shit, piss, show, eat, etc. We are so death-averse that we'd much rather have people endure their hellish existence than allow them to achieve the most enduring peace that is death.

I've been in the eugenics camp for quite some time, but this policy isn't necessarily "eugenic" because a lot of these people are genetic dead ends regardless. No girl is going to fuck a dude with cerebral palsy, for example. Watch the beginning of this video: https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnewsvideo/comments/m8zmjm/driver_gets_emotional_when_he_sees_how_his/ Most of the faggots on Reddit are tearing up, but I'm sitting here perplexed by a society that would foist such a limited and partial existence on a person who would be better off dead, and who we would be better off with dead. We're partway there; we pull life support on those in vegetative states, absent of any brain function other than that which keeps their bodies alive. Consider [these children](https://files.catbox.moe/qzqjuz.WEBP). We, as an enlightened and scientifically-informed civilization, believe that it is more compassionate and humane to keep children like this alive. There are drooling, catatonic individuals in institutions that we keep alive from that same misplaced sense of compassion. And on a different note, we keep old men and women who are completely invalid, emaciated, and dependent on others to shit, piss, show, eat, etc. We are so death-averse that we'd much rather have people endure their hellish existence than allow them to achieve the most enduring peace that is death.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (35).
[–] • 0 pt

That's how sects come about. People deviate from the religion and they become false sects of the religion they branched off of. It's very popular today for people to make up their own religion by picking and choosing different beliefs from other religions that they think makes sense to them. This is all part of a masonic new age belief that all religions are just different paths to the truth and that the natural is more important than the supernatural.

[–] • 0 pt

I'll level with you. I know that religions have been evolutionarily adaptive in enhancing solidarity, in-group preference, work ethic, individual purpose, etc. It was a good barrier against the pleasure-seeking and hedonistic behaviors popular today, but it's a tool first and foremost. That's what it's always been. A tool is meant to aid you. When it becomes less effective, ineffective, or counterproductive, you either alter it or dispense with it in favor of a better tool. If neither option are available, then you use it until they are available. Other options are now available.