WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

375

I've been in the eugenics camp for quite some time, but this policy isn't necessarily "eugenic" because a lot of these people are genetic dead ends regardless. No girl is going to fuck a dude with cerebral palsy, for example.

Watch the beginning of this video:

https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnewsvideo/comments/m8zmjm/driver_gets_emotional_when_he_sees_how_his/

Most of the faggots on Reddit are tearing up, but I'm sitting here perplexed by a society that would foist such a limited and partial existence on a person who would be better off dead, and who we would be better off with dead. We're partway there; we pull life support on those in vegetative states, absent of any brain function other than that which keeps their bodies alive.

Consider . We, as an enlightened and scientifically-informed civilization, believe that it is more compassionate and humane to keep children like this alive. There are drooling, catatonic individuals in institutions that we keep alive from that same misplaced sense of compassion.

And on a different note, we keep old men and women who are completely invalid, emaciated, and dependent on others to shit, piss, show, eat, etc. We are so death-averse that we'd much rather have people endure their hellish existence than allow them to achieve the most enduring peace that is death.

I've been in the eugenics camp for quite some time, but this policy isn't necessarily "eugenic" because a lot of these people are genetic dead ends regardless. No girl is going to fuck a dude with cerebral palsy, for example. Watch the beginning of this video: https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnewsvideo/comments/m8zmjm/driver_gets_emotional_when_he_sees_how_his/ Most of the faggots on Reddit are tearing up, but I'm sitting here perplexed by a society that would foist such a limited and partial existence on a person who would be better off dead, and who we would be better off with dead. We're partway there; we pull life support on those in vegetative states, absent of any brain function other than that which keeps their bodies alive. Consider [these children](https://files.catbox.moe/qzqjuz.WEBP). We, as an enlightened and scientifically-informed civilization, believe that it is more compassionate and humane to keep children like this alive. There are drooling, catatonic individuals in institutions that we keep alive from that same misplaced sense of compassion. And on a different note, we keep old men and women who are completely invalid, emaciated, and dependent on others to shit, piss, show, eat, etc. We are so death-averse that we'd much rather have people endure their hellish existence than allow them to achieve the most enduring peace that is death.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

It could be that anyone born white must be euthanized because they will say white is an illness and evil.

Yes, if you let Jews run the process. Whites running the process in all-white societies who seek to enhance the health of the white race will select for intelligence, strength, height, athleticism, etc. Hitler didn't have a problem with this because he wasn't a sentimental retard and because his mind projected forward by centuries.

[–] 0 pt

So you would have your retarded son euthanized?

[–] 0 pt

Yes. If your son came out like or or , you wouldn't want to euthanize it? This faggot sentimentality is literally the reason why in this situation in the first place. Retarded people live very limited and difficult existences, are a net drain because no level of productivity can compensate for their levels of consumption, and they are genetic dead ends. They are essentially human pets.

[–] 0 pt

It's easy to say that when it's not your family or your life that is up to be exterminated.