Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

824

I've been in the eugenics camp for quite some time, but this policy isn't necessarily "eugenic" because a lot of these people are genetic dead ends regardless. No girl is going to fuck a dude with cerebral palsy, for example.

Watch the beginning of this video:

https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnewsvideo/comments/m8zmjm/driver_gets_emotional_when_he_sees_how_his/

Most of the faggots on Reddit are tearing up, but I'm sitting here perplexed by a society that would foist such a limited and partial existence on a person who would be better off dead, and who we would be better off with dead. We're partway there; we pull life support on those in vegetative states, absent of any brain function other than that which keeps their bodies alive.

Consider . We, as an enlightened and scientifically-informed civilization, believe that it is more compassionate and humane to keep children like this alive. There are drooling, catatonic individuals in institutions that we keep alive from that same misplaced sense of compassion.

And on a different note, we keep old men and women who are completely invalid, emaciated, and dependent on others to shit, piss, show, eat, etc. We are so death-averse that we'd much rather have people endure their hellish existence than allow them to achieve the most enduring peace that is death.

I've been in the eugenics camp for quite some time, but this policy isn't necessarily "eugenic" because a lot of these people are genetic dead ends regardless. No girl is going to fuck a dude with cerebral palsy, for example. Watch the beginning of this video: https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnewsvideo/comments/m8zmjm/driver_gets_emotional_when_he_sees_how_his/ Most of the faggots on Reddit are tearing up, but I'm sitting here perplexed by a society that would foist such a limited and partial existence on a person who would be better off dead, and who we would be better off with dead. We're partway there; we pull life support on those in vegetative states, absent of any brain function other than that which keeps their bodies alive. Consider [these children](https://files.catbox.moe/qzqjuz.WEBP). We, as an enlightened and scientifically-informed civilization, believe that it is more compassionate and humane to keep children like this alive. There are drooling, catatonic individuals in institutions that we keep alive from that same misplaced sense of compassion. And on a different note, we keep old men and women who are completely invalid, emaciated, and dependent on others to shit, piss, show, eat, etc. We are so death-averse that we'd much rather have people endure their hellish existence than allow them to achieve the most enduring peace that is death.

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

Kill all tards. No parent should be forced to raise a useless pet, and they shouldn't be forced to make that decision either.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

tards

a useless pet

I'd object to the use of this kind of language in serious discussion. It implies moral judgement or, at the very least, contempt for those who, like us, did not choose the circumstances of their own births. Also, most pets are useless. We feed them, clean them, etc., for entertainment or comfort purposes, but they usually have zero practical use.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

With a dog, you can put it down when it's too sick or lame to function properly.

[–] • 1 pt

Get a new account, coward.

Pre-conceptive genetic counseling sidesteps the question of mass euthanasia of the innocent. We’re not jews. We don’t behave like that.

[–] • 1 pt

Agreed. The only ones of our kind that get euthanized are the race traitors. All white lives have value or none do.

[–] • 1 pt

First:

The only ones of our kind that get euthanized are the race traitors.

Then:

All white lives have value or none do.

I wonder if the contradiction even registered in your mind. So if value means deserving of life, then your willingness to execute white race traitors suggests that you don't think ALL white life matter or are deserving of life. I agree. I agree: not all white lives matter, unless you mean to spare white rapists, white pedophiles, white zoophiles, white serial killers, white homosexuals, white transvestites, white degenerates, etc.

Is that what you desire? Or are you capable of admitting that there are exceptions?

[–] • 1 pt

We’re not jews. We don’t behave like that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infant_exposure

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infanticide#In_ancient_history

The Greeks and Romans did this. I don't advocate exposure but rather a peaceful injection. I would not condemn a person to an existence that is limited or painful. Who displays greater humanity here?

[–] • 0 pt

Who displays greater humanity here?

We do. Because we can now GENETICALLY SCREEN AND COUNCIL THE PARENTS before the kid even exists. The Romans cited infant sacrifice as one of the reasons they razed Carthage, by the way.

[–] • 3 pts

Sacrificing healthy babies to deities is not equatable to euthanizing lame infants. Or are you personally incapable of making that distinction?

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Since insulted and then blocked me like a coward, my response to his is here:

I am. The women who have to consider abortion are those that you don't want reproducing. In an age where contraceptives are widely available, unplanned pregnancies are usually the result of a series of irresponsible decisions by stupid people. Like intelligence, stupidity is heritable, so the resulting children suffer the two-gut punch of stupid genes and stupid parents. Stupid parents inevitably raise their stupid children stupidly, ensuring the cycle of stupidity.

Three generations of imbeciles are enough

We want a future of tall, good-looking, attractive and intelligent people. People sharing your sentiments will stunt and ultimately doom a race.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt (edited )

Agree. My friend has a grandson born "all fucked up" and required multiple surgeries. Now at 20, he's dying a horrific death.

Iceland has near eliminated down's syndrome via abortion.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

When can we start with you?

[–] • 0 pt

Hey, if I qualify, I qualify. No helping that. Unless you only say so because the notion of humanely ending someone else's cruel existence offends your perverted sensibilities.

[–] • 1 pt

I think if a person is suffering or causes suffering in such a way that it can't be fixed then yes. No more murderers, no pedophiles or politicians lol.

[–] • 2 pts

Even group leaders are politicians. Politics is just human interaction.

[–] • 0 pt

Then you are anti-God and pro abortion. Better to just castrate folks like you in the first place :)

[–] • 0 pt

I am in favor of euthanizing OP.

[–] • 0 pt

Hey, if I qualify, I qualify. No helping it if that is indeed the case. Unless you only say so because the notion of humanely ending someone else's cruel existence offends your perverted sensibilities.

[–] • 0 pt

WTF, since when was I EVER against ending others' misery via death?!

I'm your PRO-DEATH CANDIDATE!!

[the nougat is made of poison. And sugar.]

[–] • 0 pt

Murdering innocent people is evil. Also, who decides who gets euthanized? It could be that anyone born white must be euthanized because they will say white is an illness and evil.

[–] • 0 pt

It could be that anyone born white must be euthanized because they will say white is an illness and evil.

Yes, if you let Jews run the process. Whites running the process in all-white societies who seek to enhance the health of the white race will select for intelligence, strength, height, athleticism, etc. Hitler didn't have a problem with this because he wasn't a sentimental retard and because his mind projected forward by centuries.

[–] • 0 pt

So you would have your retarded son euthanized?

[–] • 0 pt

Yes. If your son came out like or or , you wouldn't want to euthanize it? This faggot sentimentality is literally the reason why in this situation in the first place. Retarded people live very limited and difficult existences, are a net drain because no level of productivity can compensate for their levels of consumption, and they are genetic dead ends. They are essentially human pets.

[–] • 0 pt

Nope. The same reason I'm anti abortion is the same reason I'm anti euthanasia. You don't get to decide to end a life that has done no wrong because it's easy. With our technologies we can give people a quality life. Should they reproduce? No. But you can't be anti abortion and pro euthanasia without consent.

[–] • 0 pt

They may be prime for cybernetic implants or related.

jews are pushing this tech to the Goyim to control the masses. But like any tech it can be used either for good or bad.

If jews were not in charge, we would be merging tech to extend human life and intelligence.

Load more (1 reply)