WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

906

I don't jump on all the conspiracy theories easily, but the mRNA stuff does sound pretty big and sketchy. Have any other vaccines used this "new technology" to date?

I don't jump on all the conspiracy theories easily, but the mRNA stuff does sound pretty big and sketchy. Have *any* other vaccines used this "new technology" to date?

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts (edited )

You don't know much then but let me enlighten you on the topic so you won't have an excuse later down the line, because the whole point of this debate is that the mRNA doesn't use the typical "uses a virus, to cure a virus" which has been used since vaccines first came about. This new "vaccine" uses coded messenger nanotechnology which is specific to the "covid-19" genome. It claims to be able to fight against the virus by essentially hijacking the immune system to produce the antibodies it has written in it's code. It is specific to this particular strain of the virus, and this is one of the big reason for the "sketchy" because anyone with IQ higher than a chimpanzee knows that corona-viruses evolve and mutate extremely quickly (i.e. just like the seasonal flu common cold, which itself is a type of corona-virus); and this then begs the question, that if you have the mRNA coded for "covid-19", then what happens when the next "covid-21", or "covid-26", comes along? Will you have to perpetually take nanotechnology provided by the oh so trusted big tech, big pharma, and government overlords because otherwise you can't participate in society? Are my vaccinations going to be recorded and have to be displayed in a sort of "vaccination passport" if I want to participate?

The "vaccine" in this case isn't just "sketchy" because of what it does on an anatomical level (which the public is still relatively in the dark on, particularly long term) but also what it does on both an individual and societal level.

[–] 0 pt

"i.e. just like the seasonal flu, which itself is a type of corona-virus"

Wrong. Influenza is its own class of virus. Rhinovirus (the common cold), on the other hand, is a coronavirus.

Both influenza and coronaviruses have a single strand of RNA as their genome, but that is where the genomic similarity ends. The influenza virus genome comprises 7 or 8 segments, while the coronavirus has one long strand. Influenza virus RNA is what is known as ‘negative sense RNA’. This means that its sequence is the mirror image of the correct code for proteins and a complementary strand must be made from it before production of new viruses within a host cell can proceed. In contrast, the coronavirus genome is ‘positive sense’ which means it can act as messenger RNA and code for proteins.

[–] 0 pt

Thanks for the correction, had heard it was one or the other but didn't remember it was the common cold and not the flu which was a coronavirus.