Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

811

It ended in 2015, so the youngest ones from that program are now 6 years old. Did china do this intentionally to create an army with no ties to families (more men than women)? If so, does that mean that china has 9 years to use this force (when the last of the boys are 15)?

It ended in 2015, so the youngest ones from that program are now 6 years old. Did china do this intentionally to create an army with no ties to families (more men than women)? If so, does that mean that china has 9 years to use this force (when the last of the boys are 15)?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (17).
[–] • 2 pts

I was thinking about the opposite with American fighters. We will never do anything because we have plenty to lose even though we ironically have plenty to protect.

Only a true degenerate with nothing to live for or protect will have the best chance at fighting and so far the vast majority of those who are freely terrorizing Americans all share the same overlapping familial deficits.

[–] • 0 pt

That is along the same lines though. The chinese (or dark skinned "americans") have the upper hand because they have nothing to stay alive for, and don't have kids they care about.

White people with 1-3 children need to protect those at all costs, it isn't the days where we had 9 and so if 3 died for some reason you still had a line.

[–] • 0 pt

Lol, you people are such faggots.