Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

846

It ended in 2015, so the youngest ones from that program are now 6 years old. Did china do this intentionally to create an army with no ties to families (more men than women)? If so, does that mean that china has 9 years to use this force (when the last of the boys are 15)?

It ended in 2015, so the youngest ones from that program are now 6 years old. Did china do this intentionally to create an army with no ties to families (more men than women)? If so, does that mean that china has 9 years to use this force (when the last of the boys are 15)?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (17).
[–] • 0 pt

that is my point, they would make better soldiers (in an offensive war) because of that. Someone pointed out they they grew up very protected, so i'm not sure which would win out.

[–] • 0 pt

The US is still miles ahead tech-wise...internet/EMP attacks will cripple the chinks immediately.