Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

992

It ended in 2015, so the youngest ones from that program are now 6 years old. Did china do this intentionally to create an army with no ties to families (more men than women)? If so, does that mean that china has 9 years to use this force (when the last of the boys are 15)?

It ended in 2015, so the youngest ones from that program are now 6 years old. Did china do this intentionally to create an army with no ties to families (more men than women)? If so, does that mean that china has 9 years to use this force (when the last of the boys are 15)?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (17).
[–] • 1 pt

No, it was just a big-brain chink-think that backfired.

It was about a government idea for limiting population growth running into the brick wall of the Chinese tradition of wanting sons to carry on your bloodline and care for you in your old age.

[–] • 1 pt

You are probably right, but sometimes there are people pulling strings that have (((other motivations))). For example the lockdowns might have been implemented by people afraid of "the virus" but the people pushing for lockdowns might have wanted to destroy businesses who weren't part of the plan.

[–] • 1 pt

True that. One man's disaster is another man's opportunity.