That's because the min-height of <img> was set to 200px and your screencap's height is 56px.
Changed the min-height to 50px.
That's because the min-height of <img> was set to 200px and your screencap's height is 56px.
Changed the min-height to 50px.
I figured as much. I just wasn't going to bother working through the details. Was just explaining what I could to him without knowing the actual workings of the expando implementation.
I figured as much. I just wasn't going to bother working through the details. Was just explaining what I could to him without knowing the actual workings of the expando implementation.
There's a min-height to prevent users from accidentally reducing the image size below a certain size where it would make it hard to scale back up (or completely losing it below 1px) lol
There's a min-height to prevent users from accidentally reducing the image size below a certain size where it would make it hard to scale back up (or completely losing it below 1px) lol
Nice work. The minimum size makes sense to prevent complaints from people disappearing images then complaining about a bug. AC’s image is still rendering a bit disproportionately stretched (on mobile) but it is now not so skewed as to be unreadable.
Nice work. The minimum size makes sense to prevent complaints from people disappearing images then complaining about a bug. AC’s image is still rendering a bit disproportionately stretched (on mobile) but it is now not so skewed as to be unreadable.
(post is archived)