I'd support it although I'm not sure how enforceable it is.
I'd support it although I'm not sure how enforceable it is.
Make as part of the law that if bots are used, there is a tag that identifies it as a computer's artificially generated message to ID it as chat-bait (similar to putting 'advertisement' labels on the junk stories click bait that are in websites )
Make as part of the law that if bots are used, there is a tag that identifies it as a computer's artificially generated message to ID it as chat-bait (similar to putting 'advertisement' labels on the junk stories click bait that are in websites )
Make shadow bans where the user is unaware illegal
Make shadow bans where the user is unaware illegal
I agree, that should be illegal.
In a sense it already is, it's communication interception.
I agree, that should be illegal.
In a sense it already is, it's communication interception.
I agree, we need common sense text on internet laws.
Like gun laws which protect us from the ability for someone to commit murder on a level that isn't tolerable.
I agree, we need common sense text on internet laws.
Like gun laws which protect us from the ability for someone to commit murder on a level that isn't tolerable.
Maybe when there's a government in the world that isn't overrun by kikes or commies where laws matter again, that'd be a swell idea.
Maybe when there's a government in the world that isn't overrun by kikes or commies where laws matter again, that'd be a swell idea.
Even if I wasn't called a Russian Bot for years and thus know for sure that it would be used against genuine human users, I would still think it was a shitty nanny state idea.
Even if I wasn't called a Russian Bot for years and thus know for sure that it would be used against genuine human users, I would still think it was a shitty nanny state idea.
what do you think about mudkips
what do you think about mudkips
It would just be another law selectively enforced. We already have laws that are supposed to stop all this censorship, but the FCC isn't doing its job.
It would just be another law selectively enforced. We already have laws that are supposed to stop all this censorship, but the FCC isn't doing its job.
Making it illegal for a robot intelligence to impersonate a living person sounds like a nifty idea to me.
Making it illegal for a robot intelligence to impersonate a living person sounds like a nifty idea to me.
I think if AI posting as real people were banned, the internet would get significantly quieter. A lot of stuff you think are coming from real users are in fact just bots. People don't realize how bad it is, but if GPT-3 is that good and it's just some open source project, imagine what governments can do.
I think if AI posting as real people were banned, the internet would get significantly quieter. A lot of stuff you think are coming from real users are in fact just bots. People don't realize how bad it is, but if GPT-3 is that good and it's just some open source project, imagine what governments can do.
(post is archived)