WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

829

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

The roads would be better, and the rivers wouldn't be filled with literal human shit.

Maybe even a toilet or two!

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Still a shithole. Britain didn't replace the population and probably never would have. You can't turn a third world dump full of shitskins into a first world nation. The people simply lack the capacity on a biological level. And before you say the Indians had a great civilization in the past, no they did not. They've merely squatted in the remains of what the white Aryan invasion left behind after their decline.

[–] 0 pt

The uppermost caste in India is almost up to the level of whites. But they are only a small fraction of the total population.

[–] 1 pt

Whiter. Cleaner. Better infrastructure. Fewer Dravidians and mixes, and a larger percentage of European residents. Thing is, there still wouldn’t be any “whites only” regions or even any white majority regions. Europeans never had the drive to do what had to be done to natives in any of their colonies. Well, except for Australia, and even then they didn’t finish the job.

[–] 0 pt

It would be a real superpower, but with 850 million streetshitters

[–] 0 pt

A little less of a shithole. Probably more faggots, mooncrickets , and sheepfuckers..

[–] 0 pt

Better. Although the way the government has gone in the US, I doubt it will do much better in the UK. The old British rulers of India did a good job, overall -- I doubt the new Brits could do as well.

[–] 0 pt

a bigger shithole with more pakis than indians.

a lot cleaner. wouldn't be cattle roaming the streets shitting everywhere. public toilettes would be a thing no scammers i could go on but i think you get my drift.

Load more (2 replies)