You're right, though it started ramping up before. Mostly among liberals.
It's kind of insane though. Is it for deaf people who are also illiterate but yet somehow learned sign language? Because we already have subtitles.
I would love if someone could come up with a plausible "real reason" they do this -- however cynical as long as it's compelling.
You're right, though it started ramping up before. Mostly among liberals.
It's kind of insane though. Is it for deaf people who are also illiterate but yet somehow learned sign language? Because we already have subtitles.
I would love if someone could come up with a plausible "real reason" they do this -- however cynical as long as it's compelling.
Yes, closed captions are much less annoying, and we who can hear are able to turn them off. That's probably why the libtards don't use them -- they can't force us to read them.
Yes, closed captions are much less annoying, and we who can hear are able to *turn them off*. That's probably why the libtards don't use them -- they can't force us to read them.
Virtue signaling.
Virtue signaling.
(post is archived)