![Thoughts on this? (Coronoavirus) [784x450 - 57KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/uG8OT8.png){kind=link}
If the Marek chicken virus vaccine doesn’t cure the chicken of the disease but only ‘reduces symptoms’, then why are vaccinated chickens not dying too?
If there’s no genetic material of the virus introduced to one’s immune system, as with a traditional vaccine, then what is going to prompt the virus to mutate?
This is looking like fear-mongering horseshit to me. A ‘leaky vaccine’ is not a vaccine at all. Vaccines, by definition, prevent infection and transmission.
I’m not questioning the analogy between Marek’s disease and SARS CoV 2; I question the wiki on the history of Marek’s disease, if only because the language is dishonest and vague. The analogy between the two is sound in that they’re both fishy diseases with fishy ‘vaccines’.
If the Marek chicken virus vaccine doesn’t cure the chicken of the disease but only ‘reduces symptoms’, then why are vaccinated chickens not dying too
Because symptoms, such as shortness of breath, high temperature, lesions, etc are the causes of death. A symptomless infection is not deadly.
This is looking like fear-mongering horseshit to me
Not worth much how its looking to you, given that you need an explanation on the above point.
The question was ‘Thoughts on this’. I answered the question. Shortness of breath, high temperature, and lesions don’t cause death, and death is not a symptom. You nigger.
death is a symptom, turbokikeniggerfaggot
high temperature, and lesions don’t cause death
Lmao yeah buddy, high temperature doesn't cause death. Go back to elementary school you actual moron.
(post is archived)