If that is the case I think it is a real shit design choice.
If that is the case I think it is a real shit design choice.
Then I invite you to make your own website and pay for it, then you can decide for new accounts to block 50 users each and consume lots of resources with queries every time they refresh the front page or long comment threads.
I blame boobs for forgetting his dogecoin wallet password.
Too bad you can't user-side it and let their browser do the work.
We thought about it, but most users are using ad-block and noscript like extensions that are already causing issues with some poal features.
Making it client-side would require them to fully enable js for poal.co domain.
It also would consume more resources and bandwidth since they would have to load all the query data and filter them on their side, also reducing battery life on mobile.
Can I make my own website with blackjack and hookers?
Free free to
is right. With these kinds of sites tons of stuff is stored in the DB and it eats up CPU cycles to filter those things. In other words it's not a design choice it's a .
(post is archived)