You could join the Amish. It seems like it'd be a nice life these days.

Church. If they don't go to church, they are suspect. If you don't go to church, you are suspect.

Women in the United States do not hesitate to express a preference for mates who have high social status or a high-status profession, qualities that are viewed as only slightly less important than good financial prospects. Using a rating scale from irrelevant or unimportant to indispensable, American women from Massachusetts, Michigan, Texas, and California rate social status as between important and indispensable, whereas men rate it as merely desirable but not very important. In one study of 5,000 college students, women list status, prestige, rank, position, power, standing, station, and high place as important considerably more frequently than men do. American women also place great value on education and professional degrees in mates–characteristics that are strongly linked with social status. The same study found that women rate lack of education as highly undesirable in a potential husband. The cliche that women prefer to marry doctors, lawyers, professors, and other professionals seems to correspond with reality. Women shun men who are easily dominated by other men or who fail to command the respect of the group. Women's desire for status shows up in everyday occurrences. A colleague overheard a conversation among four women at a restaurant. They were all complaining that there were no eligible men around. Yet these women were surrounded by male waiters, none of whom was wearing a wedding ring. Waiters, who do not have a high status occupation, were apparently not even considered by these women. What they meant was not that there were no eligible men, but that there were no eligible men of acceptable social status. Women on the mating market look for “eligible” men. The word eligible is a euphemism for “not having his resources already committed elsewhere.” The frequency with which the word appears in the combination “eligible bachelor” reveals the mating desires of women. When women append an adverb to this phrase, it becomes "most eligible bachelor," referring not to the man's eligibility but rather to his social status and the magnitude of his resources. It is a euphemism for the highest status, most resource-laden unattached man around.” ~ David M. Buss; The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating; 1995

“Dating” is never okay. It’s a dialectical code word for “girls being sluts.” If you want be with a girl, you ask her father permission to court her, and then after a period of supervised courtship and with her bride price paid you marry her. A good (and historic) age gap is ten years. With this knowledge, we must ask why it changed. The answer is, unfortunately, like so many we have already seen: powerful, influential, and persuasive people decided to change it. Women, being the more group-oriented, consensus-seeking sex, easily fell prey to their propaganda. And women, being the sexual gatekeepers, quickly reshaped the courtship environment. Why was this social changed forced upon the West? It weakens the family, which is a center of power and organization that they don’t–and can’t–control. It weakens traditional society, making way for reforms and changes to fit their deterministic vision of how things should be. It stimulates far more economic consumption than traditional courtship. It reduces fertility, which is a key component of white genocide. Finally, it accords with their antinomian ideals of “individualism” and “egalitarianism.”

Sprinkle in little comments like "towel head" and see if they giggle or give you a stern look.

To marry, you are trying to find a wife, not a girlfriend.