JEWS ARE A GENETIC GROUP
As a genetic group, they are predisposed to certain behaviors, as all genetic groups are. Salmon swim upstream to spawn. Birds migrate. Cattle can walk almost immediately after being born. Giraffes eat tall branches; antelope eat grass. Lions live in packs and have their women hunt. Tigers work alone and hunt for themselves.
Jews are genetically schizophrenic.
Many other genetic illnesses predisposes jewish behavior toward things that sane people find utterly unconscionable and dangerous to their existence. The jewish Talmud explicitly says that non-jews are animals in human form, to be stolen from, murdered, defrauded, how young and how to dispose of their non-jewish fuck targets. As it frowns upon miscegenation, jews have reinforced their own genetic illnesses through the centuries. Jews do not consider non-jews converting to judaism (the religion) authentic because they’re not genetic jews (the race).
To summarize:
DNA determines behavior Jewish behavior created jewish culture Jewish culture created the jewish religion The jewish religion reinforced the jewish DNA WHAT IS JEWISH BEHAVIOR?
BDS, Pilpul, USS Liberty, Protocols of Zion, Kroll Inc, Larry Silverstein, Dancing Israelis, Metzitzah B'peh, Herpes from circumcision, Eric Clopper Harvard, Bible: circumcision for Jews and slaves of Jews, 20,000 nerves in foreskin, Circumcision related brain damage, Goyim, Kapparot, Tay-Sachs, Jesus according to Talmud, Yebhamot 11b, Simon of Trent, Blood Libel, Jews in pornography, Greg Lansky, Al Goldstein, Shiksa, Loxism, Jacob & Esau, Shabbos Goy, New Haven Jewish slave markets, Black Hebrew Israelite, 70% of Jews v 1% of whites owned slaves, 109 countries, Bolshevik Revolution, Karl Marx, Moses Hess, Holodomor, Dresden Holocaust, Israeli Nukes, Samson Option, Wooden Doors, "Six Million Jews" in newspapers before Hitler, Martin H. Glynn, Dean Irebodd, Kevin MacDonald, David Cole, Anne Frank died of Typhus, Masturbation Machines, Bear & Eagle, Shitting Diamonds, TGSNT, David Irving, Magnus Hirschfeld, R@ygold, Epstein didn't kill himself, Sackler family, Sassoon family, Julius & Ethel Rosenberg, Bernie Madoff, The Melting Pot: by Israel Zangweil, Poem on Statue of Liberty by Emma Lazarus, I'm not white I'm Jewish, Kalergi Plan & Prize, Frankfurt School, Barbara L. Spectre, Hart-Celler Act, Lavon Affair, Bilderberg Group, Henry Ford on Jews, Sabbatai Zevi, Star of Remphan, Gotthard Tunnel, Anton LaVay, Moloch, Black Cube, Red Shield, Sergeants Affair, King David Hotel, Irgun, Lehi, Nakam, Psy-Group, ADL, Mossad, APAIC, JIDF, White Phosphorous, Das Judenthum in der Musik, Deuteronomy 6:10, Revelation 2:9
Not all things opposite have equal power.
That's you believing that opposites are in conflict with each other; that they have different values. You are the value in-between them; you are the power of free will to make a choice between them. Inception and death is what defines your life between them. Beginning and end are defined by what you do within them. We are all equal as energy, which is what allows all of us to be different within energy aka different potential within equal potentiality.
The likes of "universal balance" and "equal opposites" are not from the life-saving dogma of salvation.
Beginning (inception) and end (death); with you as balance in the middle. Adhere to it (need) and you self sustain (life); ignore it (want) and you self destruct (death). It's seeking salvation in others, that is corrupting sustenance of self.
Only the holy spirit, which is granted not seized, can teach discernment despite and beyond the clothing of ideas.
The "granted not seized" part refers to claiming ownership over that which nature offers free for all (the origin of selfishness aka when ONE tries to claim ALL). Holy spirit represents the contradiction between holy (that which represents all) and spirit (to breath, that which represents the ONE). By putting it together as an offered idol, it becomes a false authority that deceives ONE to ignore self for another ONE, while not comprehending ALL anymore, but a substitute thereof instead (a deity).
If up or down were on earth... they would be equal opposites indeed
They are inspiration for your consciousness. Up and down are not fixed states, but the balance between mental comprehension of them, and the physical consequences in between them. You are the one who can point at a mountain and say that's "up", then you can climb that mountain and standing on it's top while defining it as down, while you jump up. Your free will redefined the natural opposites you comprehend mentally within the physical.
But if up or down were from the spiritual realm, they could separate life and death
Inception was set into motion, which defines death to be the outcome. What happens in between is on you, but the beginning defined the end. Life represents the balance in between them, just like your physical perception and your mental comprehension need to be in balance. The physical is the inspiration for the mental, but only the mental can comprehend how the physical operates, and that demands adaptation.
But the dogma of salvation teaches that realms exist where death has been vanquished.
Who offered the dogma, and how would they benefit from having you believe in substitute states for reality? Wouldn't they have everything to gain from you ignoring everything offered to you by nature?
If truth isn't part of natural law, then why do you promote it?
I don't promote truth; I even constantly state to NOT believe me. I try to inspire comprehension by putting "lies" into perspective under natural law to show the contradiction. There cannot be a "truth" (an unchanging fundamental) within a system based on change, but that also doesn't mean that the ever changing information (energy) is a lie, because nature doesn't lie; it just offers information for inspiration. The truth vs lie conflict is only in our beliefs, based on our ignorance of motion (of reality). Language is the corruption her, because it allows us to proclaim what we believe truth is, which then corrupts those around us into a conflict about believing or not believing your selfish offer of substitute reality (fiction).
"The water is wet" is not truth, which you can learn if you try to jump into it during winter. Language allows us to contradict reality in the comprehension of others who believe us or choose to oppose our beliefs. "The water is wet" is also not a lie, but information within motion. It is wet, it is frozen; it is vapor. None of these are truth or lies, just information within motion demanding adaptation from us. If you choose to believe in one or the other side you ignore order (self sustenance within balance) for chaos (conflict).
You seem to essentially portray "life" as "information-motion" and thus "death" as "alienation" from such movements.
Nope. Adherence to self sustenance (life) within motion represents the recharge of potentiality within energy, while the ignorance to self sustenance (life) within motion represents the loss of potentiality within energy. Both are needed for the balance in-between; for the cycles of loss/recharge; for our life cycles.
"Alienation" refers to a negative connotation, based on your belief in conflict instead of coexistence, which is also why a deity cannot exist without a boogeyman, because believers create the conflict with non-believers, and so both sides need to be branded so that the conflict is about WHAT they believe and not about THAT they believe.
Yet there is no recognized mechanism for discernment, only "movement-life" or "alienation-death"
There is. Motion as a function within energy aims forward (beginning towards end). Motion also creates momentum, aka temporary balance within motion, which represents the struggle of all within momentum against the forward motion. That is the shared survival instinct among all conscious life, which defines adherence to need to sustain self. Self discernment is adherence to instinct, which allows comprehension of natural law (the rules that define how motion operates). On instinctive level that's a simple as "needs over wants", which is why all other lifeforms are instinctively adhere to natural law.
Deeper than that and comprehension of self sustenance leads to comprehension of self...what is it that we sustain? Our blood; that which sustains beyond death within our bloodline; within our offspring. To overcome death; one sets life into motion, and the maternal and paternal instinct is what teaches that the value of self is shared within the bloodline, because ones you hold your offspring in your arms; self sustenance becomes about the shared responsibility to sustain the child. Self sustenance leading to unity.
Because you exclude true and false, which ultimately include the spirit of a person
Spirit aka "to breath" represents the contract to self sustenance, which establishes natural law over free will of choice on instinctive level, because the mental choice of adherence or ignorance does not hold authority over the physical act of breathing. One needs severe corruption to mentally consent to physically end ones life. Adherence or ignorance are also neither truth or false; nor in conflict with each other.
the measure of "sustenance" you describe is more akin to that of the body
One needs comprehension of motion to sustain the body aka body and mind in balance. One mentally comprehends natural law; while being physically under its consequences. The rules that define how motion operates can only be mentally comprehended within the physical consequences (form) of motion. One can only comprehend ones inception and death; never experience the beginning and end of it. The reason why ONE is, is because ONE was set into motion, and the consequence of ONE to be is that motion will end him.
The soul needs a path to salvation that frees it from the natural realm
You were offered temporary participation within all of existence, yet you want more. That's as selfish as it gets, and the parasite merchants are offering you exactly what you want...salvation in exchange for consent to faith aka ignorance of reality aka ignored potential for the merchants who have no problem wielding it against all others.
able to maintain "survival" of bodies, doesn't hold in itself the power to overcome death of the soul.
Again; blood is that which survives; not the body or the mind. Self sustenance means to maintain that which is in motion, and body and mind are temporary tools to do just that...maintain the blood. Now, who holds the monopoly on blood on this world? Coincidence? Look up the connection between Mormon genealogy, the server capacity in Utah and their ties to the (rothschild/bauer) owned Red Cross. Blood libel, abortion, 23andMe, vampires, blue blood royalty, ancient bloodlines...what do you think all of this is based upon?
Linking the classic Oprah interview of a woman talking about how a very small percentage of Jewish families sacrifice living children to Satan:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEYWw1l16WcYouTube
Blood Libel Jewish Ritual Murder Sacrifice:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/MAfHReulkDXE/BitChute
book - On Jewish Ritual Murder
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/HTML-docs/Jewish_Ritual_Murder.htm
https://files.catbox.moe/nngngc.jpg Jewish ritual murder of christian children = Blood libel.
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER IN ENGLAND BEFORE THE EXPULSION OF 1290
The first known case happened in 1144; after that, cases cropped up from time to time until the Jews were expelled from the realm by Edward I. The most famous of these cases was that of Little St. Hugh of Lincoln in 1255. I record these cases in chronological order; and I do not deny the possibility of some of them in which details are lacking, being "trumped-up" ones, where death may have been due to causes other than ritual murder and the Jews blamed for it; but the case of St. Hugh, particularly, was juridically decided, and the Close and Patent Rolls of the Realm record definitely cases at London, Winchester and Oxford. There seems no reason to doubt that many cases of ritual murder have been unsuspected and even undiscovered.
1144- Norwich. A twelve-year-old boy was crucified and his side pierced at the Jewish Passover. His body was found in a sack hidden in a tree. A converted Jew, called Theobald of Cambridge, confessed that the Jews took blood every year from a Christian child because they thought that only by so doing could they ever obtain their freedom and return to Palestine, and that it was their custom to draw lots to decide whence the blood was to be supplied; Theobald said that last year the lot fell to Narbonne but in this year to Norwich. The boy was locally beatified and has ever since been known as St. William. The Sheriff, probably bribed, refused to bring the Jews to trial. Note; Modern Jews were never in Palestine.
1192- Winchester. A boy crucified. Mentioned in Jewish Encyclopedia as being a false charge. Details lacking.
1232- Winchester. Boy crucified. Details lacking. Mentioned in Hyamson's History of the Jews in England; also in Annals of Winchester; and conclusively in the Close Roll 16, Henry III, membrane 8, 26.6. 1232.
1235- Norwich. In this case, the Jews stole a child and hid him with a view to crucifying him. Haydn's Dictionary of Dates of date 1847, says of this case, "They (the Jews) circumcise and attempt to crucify a child at Norwich; the offenders are condemned in a fine of 20,000 marks." Further authority Huillard Breolles Grande Chronique, III, 86. Also Close Roll, 19 Henry III, m 23.
1244- London. A child's body found unburied in the cemetery of St. Benedict, with ritual cuts. Buried with great pomp in St. Paul's. Authority: Social England, Vol. I, p. 407, edited by H. D. Traill.
1255- Lincoln. A boy called Hugh was kidnapped by the Jews and crucified and tortured in hatred of Jesus Christ. The boy's mother found the body in a well on the premises of a Jew called Joppin or Copinus. This Jew, promised by the judge his life if he confessed, did so, and 91 Jews were arrested; eventually 18 were hanged for the crime. King Henry III himself personally ordered the juridical investigation of the case five weeks after the discovery of the body, and refused to allow mercy to be shown to the Jew Copinus, who was executed. Note; Throwing bodies in wells was common when Jews killed in Russia and Palestine
1257- London. A child sacrificed. Authority: Cluverius. Epitome Historia, p. 541. Details lacking.
1276- London. Boy crucified. Authority: The Close Roll of the Realm, 4, Edward I, membrane 14, 3.3.1276.
1279- Northampton. A child crucified. Haydn's Dictionary of Dates, 1847, says of this case: "They (the Jews) crucify a child at Northampton for which 50 are drawn at horses' tails and hanged." Further authorities: Reiley, Memorials of London, p. I5; H. Desportes, Le Mystere du Sang.
1290- Oxford. The Patent Roll 18 Edward I, mem. 21, 21st June, 1290, contains an order for the gaol delivery of a Jew, Isaac de Pulet, detained for the murder of a Christian boy at Oxford.
Only one month after this, King Edward issued his decree expelling the Jews from the Kingdom. There is, then, every reason to believe that it was the Oxford murder which proved the last straw in toleration.
It didn't just happen in England though.
1171- Blois, France. At Passover, a Christian child was crucified, his body drained of blood and thrown into the river. A number of Jews were executed. Authority: Monumenta Germania Historica, VI, 520; Magd Cent., 12, C. 14 and 13, C. 14.
1179- Pontoise. The authorities for this case are the Bollandists (Acta, Vol. III, March, 591); Madg. Cent., 23, c. 14; Spec. Vinc, 129, C. 25; and Cosm. Munst., 23, C. 14. A boy named Richard was tortured, crucified and bled white. Philip Augustus's chaplains and historians, Rigord and Guillaume l'Armoricain, attested this case. The body of the boy was taken to the Church of the Holy Innocents in Paris and he was canonised as St. Richard.
1235- Fulda, Hesse-Nassau. Five children murdered; Jews confessed under torture, but said the blood was wanted for healing purposes. Frederick II exonerated the Jews from suspicion, but the Crusaders had already dealt with a number by putting them to death. Frederick II called together a number of converted Jews, who denied the existence of Jewish ritual murder. But Frederick's bias is evident in his own words when, in publishing his decision, he gives his objects in calling these people together, "although our conscience regarded the innocence of the aforesaid Jews adequately proved on the ground of several writings." Had Frederick II lived today, he would have relied little upon religious literature in deciding whether Jewish Ritual Murder exists or not. Authority: Chron. Hirsaug., and Magd. Cent., 13, C. 24.
1247- Valreas, France. Just before Easter, a two-year-old girl's body was found in the town moat with wounds on forehead, hands and feet. Jews confessed under torture that they wanted the blood of the child, but did not say that it was for ceremonial purposes. Pope Innocent IV said that three of the Jews were executed without confessing, but the Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. III, p. 261, says they confessed.
1250- Saragossa. A boy crucified, afterwards canonized as St. Dominiculus. Pius VII, 24th Nov., 1805, confirmed a decree of the Congregation of Rites of 31st August, according this canonization.
1261- Pforzheim, Baden. An old woman sold a seven-year-old girl to the Jews, who bled her, strangled her and threw the body into the river. The old woman was convicted on the evidence of her own daughter. A number of Jews were condemned to death, two committing suicide. Authorities: Bollandists, Acta, Vol. II, p. 838; Rohrbacher, L' Histoire Universelle de l'Eglise Catholique, Vol. XVIII, pp. 697-700; Thos. Cantipranus, De ratione vitae Vol. II, xxix. The child was canonised as a saint.
1287- Berne. Rudolf, a boy, was murdered at Passover in the house of a rich Jew called Matler. Jews confessed that he had been crucified; many were put to death. The boy was canonised as a martyr, and his name can be found in several martyrologies. Documental authorities: Bollandists, Acta, Vol. II, April; Helvetia sancta (H. Murer); Karl Howald, Die Brunnen zu Bern, 1848, p. 250; Cosm. Aims., 13, p. 482. But a stone monument still exists in Berne commemorating the crime. It is called The Fountain of the Child-Devourer, and is now on the Kornhausplatz. It represents a monster, with a Jewish countenance, eating a child. The figure wears the Judenbut, the hat prescribed for the Jews to wear by decree of the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215. This monument was first placed in a street of the Jews' quarter as a reminder of the monstrous crime and as a punishment for the whole of Berne Jewry. Later, it was removed to its present situation.
1288- Troyes, France. Some Jews were tried for a ritual murder and 13 were executed by burning. Authority: Jewish Encyclopedia, 1906, Vol. XII, p. 267.
1286- Oberwesel, on the Rhine. A boy named Werner was tortured for three days at Passover, hanged by the legs and bled white. The body was found in the river. This boy was beatified in the diocese of Treves, and his anniversary is on 19th April. A sculptured representation of this ritual murder is still to be seen in the Oberwesel Church. Authorities: Aventinus, Annals of Bavaria, 1591, 17, p. 576; Chron. Hirsaug., Magd. Cent., 13, c. 14.
1462- Rinn, Innsbruck. A boy called Andreas Oxner was bought by the Jews and sacrificed for his blood on a stone in the forest. The body was found by his mother in a birch-tree. No Jew was apprehended because, the border being near, they had fled when the crime was made known. The Abbe Vacandard, defender of the Jews, says there was no trial. Well, of course there wasn't. Even in 1937 there is no trial for a crime where the criminals have escaped! The boy has been sanctified by Pope Benedict XIV in his Bull Beatus Andreas, Venice, 1778, which says he was " cruelly assassinated by the Jews in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ." This last is admitted by Pope Clement XIV, who wrote his report on the investigation he made into the matter of Jewish Ritual Murder when, as Cardinal Ganganelli, he had been commissioned by Pope Benedict XIV to go into the matter; and in this report, he says "I admit the truth of another fact, which happened in the year 1462 in the village of Rinn, in the Diocese of Brixen, in the person of the Blessed Andreas, a boy barbarously murdered by the Jews in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ." No one questions the historical occurrence or this case. An engraving on wood representing the Ritual Murder still exists in the church.
Salmon swim upstream to spawn.
Read this as "Shalom swim upstream to spawn."
(post is archived)