lol
They are the simple rules of this place, and users agree with them when they register.
The rules are vague and open to interpretation. "Calls to violence" doesn't mean anything. It's a bullshit phrase designed to be interpreted however any arbitrary asshole wants to interpret it to stamp out words that make their vaginas sore.
The TOS also wrongly states that calls to violence aren't protected under the 1st Amendment. The 1st Amendment was written by people who openly called for violence against their government, and wrote that the American people should rise up and engage in violence against their government at least one in every generation.
The law of the United States is actually opposite to the claims in the TOS. In , the Supreme Court established that speech advocating illegal conduct is protected under the First Amendment unless the speech is intended to produce imminent lawless action AND likely to incite “ imminent lawless action.”
The rules are vague and open to interpretation.
They aren't. No calls to violence is pretty clear.
No calls to violence is pretty clear.
Not even close.
What does "violence" mean in this context? Does it mean violence like when moron leftists say words are violence? Is prodding someone to use the term "nigger" a call to violence, then?
What if I say, "a woman should use a tazer against anyone attempting to rape her"? That's a clear call to violence. Is it against the rules to call upon people to defend themselves?
How about the general statement, "oppressed peoples should rise up against their oppressors"? That's a call to violence. That's against poal's rules? That's absurd.
(post is archived)