The rules are vague and open to interpretation.
They aren't. No calls to violence is pretty clear.
No calls to violence is pretty clear.
Not even close.
What does "violence" mean in this context? Does it mean violence like when moron leftists say words are violence? Is prodding someone to use the term "nigger" a call to violence, then?
What if I say, "a woman should use a tazer against anyone attempting to rape her"? That's a clear call to violence. Is it against the rules to call upon people to defend themselves?
How about the general statement, "oppressed peoples should rise up against their oppressors"? That's a call to violence. That's against poal's rules? That's absurd.
Not even close.
It is, you just decide to make your own definition of it when the ToS is pretty clear on that.
Users agree not to post calls to violence (this is not protected speech under the 1st Amendment) or specific threats of violence. (ie, I am going to this persons house at this time to kill them with this weapon)
It's so clear you can't answer any of the questions, and you're the one who purports to understand it.
(post is archived)