Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

395

Just look at the two big stats maybe three

  1. 13% commit 54% of the murders and this number is really not accurate when you really break it down

Black males between the age of 12 and 40 <<< what maybe 3% of the population commit 50% of the murders

  1. If you removed black and Latinos from violent gun crime in New York the crime rate would drop by 98%

  2. Black on white rape is off the charts not to mention general violent crimes

When Whiteman said over and over blacks could not integrate into white society do these stats not prove them right?

I'm not even racist per se<<< except against the jews because with out the jew brainwashing and propaganda there would not have been this much race mixing and integration blacks and whites could have lived next to each other with occasional problems, but the mass destruction of white western civilization is the 

   JEW... EVERY SINGLE TIME
Just look at the two big stats maybe three 1. 13% commit 54% of the murders and this number is really not accurate when you really break it down Black males between the age of 12 and 40 <<< what maybe 3% of the population commit 50% of the murders 2. If you removed black and Latinos from violent gun crime in New York the crime rate would drop by 98% 3. Black on white rape is off the charts not to mention general violent crimes When Whiteman said over and over blacks could not integrate into white society do these stats not prove them right? I'm not even racist per se<<< except against the jews because with out the jew brainwashing and propaganda there would not have been this much race mixing and integration blacks and whites could have lived next to each other with occasional problems, but the mass destruction of white western civilization is the JEW... EVERY SINGLE TIME

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (19).
[–] • 2 pts

The easy counter to that argument is: What is the current-better replacement that makes this old way antiquated? Antiquated implies that something better has come along. Harnessing fire is eons old yet the technology still fuels so much of modern life. The horse and buggy as a main mode of transportation is antiquated because ICE vehicles are so much better at the task. If EVs can do it better than ICE (and honestly I'm not sure they can), ICE will be antiquated.

So what model performs better than the nuclear family in terms of childhood outcomes? There is no current model; single-mother households are pretty much the predictor for crime and negative outcomes; you're considered to have "beaten the odds" if you succeed or even break even in that circumstance. Faggot households tend to beget more faggots and in one breath people will tell you "there's nothing wrong with faggotry" and in the next say "Western civilization has declining fertility rates so we need to import niggers."

Consistently, historically, the nuclear family has been valued in all societies that succeeded. And it will come to pass again, but I'm pretty sure it's going to be after the Great Reset. I think the "Great Filter" that prevents civilizations like ours from becoming galactic masters (or even multi-stellar civilizations) is that, once the K-selected (smart animals capable of passing on knowledge and development in low-population, high-investment offspring) create a certain level of comfort and technology, the R-selected (dumb animals essentially capable of breeding and breathing - low investment in offspring beyond shitting them out) are free to grow unencumbered by the pressures that would normally cull them and keep the population in check. The K-selected are overrun in this scenario, and the R-selected consume and destroy everything the K's created. Eventually R's die en masse from overpopulation and scarce resources and either become K's or the few remaining K's survive and rebuild from the scarce resources.

Or everyone dies. That could happen too.