Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

372

I checked his comments. What was the bannable offense? He makes comments against Catholics?

I checked his comments. What was the bannable offense? He makes comments against Catholics?

(post is archived)

[–] [Sticky] • 1 pt

Kept spamming off-topic comment in every single post (all mostly political) to stir religious drama after receiving a warning.

[–] • 2 pts

Kept spamming off-topic comment in every single post (all mostly political) to stir religious drama after receiving a warning.

If he had replaced the word "Catholics" with "Jews", would he have been banned?

[–] • 0 pt

Some accounts tried and got warned too. Your concern trolling is obvious.

[–] • 2 pts

Some accounts tried and got warned too.

I can click on ANY story involving a Jew and they'll be named in the comments.

Your concern trolling is obvious.

Your SJW terminology in response to your hypocrisy is obvious. Who's the "concern troll"? Are you "concerned" that some guy was ragging on Catholics in the same manner Jews are?

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

He is an Israeli troll, like and

[–] • 1 pt

Based on a quick check on comment history and the fact that I didn’t issue the ban, I’d guess it was pedophilia.

[–] • 2 pts

Based on a quick check on comment history and the fact that I didn’t issue the ban, I’d guess it was pedophilia.

What, in the comment history, leads you to "pedophilia"? Was he posting child porn? His comment history, as far as I can tell, is full of anti-Catholic comments. And considering the pedophile problem among the Catholic priesthood, that doesn't lend me to think he was posting bannable "pedophilia".

Do you actually care why he was banned? Do you believe in Poal as a free speech site? You have some sway. Why don't you personally ask AOC what, exactly, he posted that was bannable?

[–] • 1 pt

Do you actually care why he was banned? Do you believe in Poal as a free speech site?

Concern Troll is concerned.

[–] • 2 pts

Concern Troll is concerned.

"Concern Troll" is SJW-tier terminology when you point out their hypocrisy.

[–] • 1 pt

If you’d like me to dig into it further I’ll have to do it after work. I have a full time job and a family so during the day generally I have to ration my time on poal the best I can.

[–] • 1 pt

Comments link: https://poal.co/u/PsychoTheRapist/comments

Site shows: " 4d ago AOU Banned PsychoTheRapist"

[–] • 1 pt

Comments link: https://poal.co/u/PsychoTheRapist/comments

Site log shows: " 4d ago AOU Banned PsychoTheRapist"

If you would have pinged you would have gotten an answer much more quickly.

[–] • 1 pt

If you would have pinged you would have gotten an answer much more quickly.

Wrong. I him directly. Never got an answer, even though he "answered" another about his new retarded policy on user blocking in the same timeframe. Of course, he doesn't explain himself or argue logic, just acts like an obnoxious 10-year old.

[–] • 1 pt

Apologies. I missed your direct question.

[–] • 0 pt

Dont ping me shill. Run back to glp with the other tavistock jews.

[–] • 0 pt

I'm not surprised given that he got the Suspicious Behavior tag. I think he got it twice.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

AOU banned him for cause. Do you think that user, PsychoTheRapist, would never ever do anything to get banned?

[–] • 1 pt

AOU banned him for cause.

What cause?

Do you think that user, PsychoTheRapist, would never ever do anything to get banned?

No, but that doesn't mean he DID. All I can tell is that he posted anti-Catholic comments.

[–] • 0 pt

you faggot kikes should worry more about subverting christianity, not websites that call out your subversion.

am i right?