randomness is fake, but an extra spatial dimension is within reason (explaining the unknown causes pawned off on "randomness" and interminability)
randomness is fake, but an extra spatial dimension is within reason (explaining the *unknown* causes pawned off on "randomness" and interminability)
Sounds theoretical
Sounds theoretical
its all theoretical
(but randomness is mathematical bullshit)
its all theoretical
(but randomness is mathematical bullshit)
I’m not disagreeing. I recently heard someone criticising randomness and do w very good job of it. But of course I don’t remember well enough to summarise it
I’m not disagreeing. I recently heard someone criticising randomness and do w very good job of it. But of course I don’t remember well enough to summarise it
(post is archived)