Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

866

I think it’s gay and fake. Though I will appreciate valuable inputs

I think it’s gay and fake. Though I will appreciate valuable inputs

(post is archived)

[–] • 6 pts

The math is not fake but the physical interpretation is arbitrary.

[–] • 1 pt

I'd say the math is fake (I took a class)

You can't even prove the speed of light Einstein b.s. since a perfect vacuum doesn't exist. It's like a Church we use their holy measurements and equations that only they can prove

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.

-Nikola Tesla

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

It's like a Church we use their holy measurements and equations that only they can prove

It's called SCIENTISM.

[–] • 0 pt

Couldn't there be basically perfect vacuum in between galaxies and such? Everything has already been pulled apart by the gravity of said galaxies. What would be left? The void.

[–] • 5 pts

Technically no, but realistically yes. Average particles per cubic light would not be zero. Could be.00000000000000000000000000001

Which is not zero. Not perfect. Like how your car isn't gonna get the mileage claimed, and you don't always get exactly 1.000000000000 gallons of gas when the pump says so. But that number is better than guessing, or picking numbers from a hat, and if the latest guess predicts things better than the old one, than it will be strongly considered, and discussed.

Most science is "this works pretty good, and allows us to make reasonable predictions about how the universe will behave.

We can and will improve this idea/formula/equation, and the best way to do that is to find situations in which the current understanding is demonstrably wrong/incomplete. AND showing why it is incomplete/wrong creating a new formula that exceeds the old in both reliability accuracy.

[–] • 1 pt

No such thing as gravity, where are the physical gravitons? They only exist theoretically like communism.

[–] • 1 pt

Hmm OK but earth is flat though

[–] • 0 pt

There's perfect vacuum between fundamental particles in an atom #mindblown

[–] • 2 pts

It's the superposition of gay and fake until you measure it and collapse the gayfake waveform.

[–] • 1 pt

I hate collapsing gayfake waveforms. It gets glitter everywhere

[–] • 2 pts

No, forum sliding FBI cuck trying to create the next group of Q-anon retards, it is neither fake nor gay, despite all your sock puppet accounts in the comments agreeing with you. Kill yourself.

[–] • 1 pt

What? Are you mentally ill? I don’t have sock accounts and I hate q fags. I just a question that I have been pondering upon recently

[–] • 0 pt

It's an idiotic question that ten seconds of internet research and a basic education answer. You're a fucking idiot if you're not a three letter agency twerp.

[–] • 1 pt

Would that be the same type of internet search that would tell you there was no proof of election fraud or that Hitler killed 6 million Jews?

[–] • 1 pt

right because google will tell me the truth. You are a fucking retard. I just asked for opinions on the matter since I keep an open mind on all topics

[–] • 0 pt

Nope quantum theory ranks right up there with communism.

[–] • -1 pt

Just a straight denial with no evidence? Yeah, ok, just gonna ignore you.

[–] • 0 pt

What evidence do you have for quantum theory being a reality? We used quantum theory to work out fuel thermokinetics and radical species propagation, the theory was full of holes and we had to modify our models heavily to approach experimental results. Using trial and error modification to our models was 35% more accurate than quantum mechanics but it was 6,000% less resource intensive meaning disregarding quantum theory made us vastly more productive. Your move.

[–] • 2 pts

Most advanced physics is.

Every "totally new discovery" is literally just;

well we have no idea what this means, but it leads to infinite -/+ so we'll just say it disproves God!

[–] • 2 pts

Apparently, same exact explanation being applied in medicine and health care

[–] • 1 pt

randomness is fake, but an extra spatial dimension is within reason (explaining the unknown causes pawned off on "randomness" and interminability)

[–] • 0 pt

Sounds theoretical

[–] • 0 pt

its all theoretical

(but randomness is mathematical bullshit)

[–] • 0 pt

I’m not disagreeing. I recently heard someone criticising randomness and do w very good job of it. But of course I don’t remember well enough to summarise it

[–] • 1 pt

Which version?

11 flavors?

13?

Yes pretty much.

Science is supposed to be used to approximate nature. And most of those formulas are great for say, building out computers or communications.

But is it a substitute for nature?

No. There's tons of nature totally inexplicable to the equations.

But people forgot that along the way I guess.

But yeah, science is supposed to be an approximation of nature.

[–] • 0 pt

Interesting. I do need to study more, however I really believe it’s being forced into pop culture so hard. They talk about quantum entanglement in consciousness and some quantum bs in medicine etc

[–] • 0 pt

Sure.

Theyre just trying to explain stuff we already know about.

The quantum entanglement is the "silver thread" coming out of the top of everyone's head that connects us to God.

You can feel it if you waive your hand over your head and are sensitive enough.

NPCs have a very small thread or totally cut.

[–] • 1 pt

That will be an interesting experiment to do. Probably will help raise my consciousness

[–] • 1 pt

Considering that with every new discovery, their predictions are wrong and they have to rewrite their own rules; I'd say probably.

[–] • 1 pt

That’s exactly why I asked this question. They are literally clueless in most new scientific problems. It’s more apparent in medicine than anywhere else though

[–] • 1 pt

Medicine is FUBAR more than most would believe. I can't remember the last nurse I met that knew their way around the body. They follow protocols without question and have no idea what to do when faced with something novel. It should be expected, diversity hires aren't hired for their skills after all.

[–] • 0 pt

I mean nurses I don’t even consider to be in medicine, they are dumb and just glorified maids. And most doctors are dumb too who finished school by rote learning. But I was shocked to find even the experts specialists are fucking clueless

[–] • 1 pt

100%

They'll keep releasing stupid stuff like "Quantum computers" but you'll never see one or know someone that works with them

[–] • 2 pts

You clearly need to read this paper on Quantum Computers https://web.archive.org/web/20201120040951/https://ascf.us/quantum-computing-the-implications-for-cybersecurity-are-enormous/

I happen to know the guy that wrote this. Really smart guy.

[–] • 1 pt

That's a nice theoretical concept, will be interesting if they can put it to market in 50-60 years.

[–] • 1 pt

A guy I know says normal computers work because of quantum mechanics. He is ubër blue pilled and believes in science

[–] • 0 pt

They follow the laws of electromagnetism. Computers are DC machines, your power supply converts AC to DC through rectifiers. Your computer is wired like your car. Both run on DC.

[–] • 1 pt

He was talking about internal computation and communication of information within

[–] • 0 pt

Can confirm quantum computers are real. Cannot confirm they perform better than what most people have sitting at home. Maybe they've improved in the last few years, but they seem a lot like snake oil computers, to me.

[–] • -1 pt

Remember 'nanotubes'? lol

[–] • 2 pts

no i think i'm too young but i was thinking recently and remember "Dolly the sheep" in 2000. we never heard about cloning again

[–] • 0 pt

Jews, IF-WS2 more Julys aka jew lies. Tungsten disulfied mixed with ionic liquids and hexagonal boron nitrate is where the good lube is at.

[–] • 1 pt

What part do you find fake and gay?

[–] • -1 pt

Entanglement and the object decides to appear if you happen to look at it

Gay

[–] • 1 pt

I have a PhD in Physical Chemistry. I have had several classes on quantum mechanics. The math is very real and the models work well within their limits. Still a lot to learn but when isn’t there?

If you think it’s fake and gay, it’s because you’re too retarded to understand it.

[–] • 0 pt

Thanks for your reply. Yes, I suspected I might be too retarded to grasp it. However, I still think the pop culture forcing it on to us is super gay, and any other field adopting “quantum” or entanglement is fake

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, a big problem with how people understand is all the bullshit that makes it’s way into media. Most of the shit you see when they “make it accessible” is just misinterpretations and bullshit. So the public never gets to see the real stuff outside of taking a class. Which most will never do.

[–] • 0 pt

Well, I’m the public and for my viewpoint it’s looking like garbage. I could study it myself but I don’t think I will understand it like a mathematician so I won’t try

[–] • 0 pt

What do you think of butanol as a synthetic fuel?

[–] • 0 pt

What do you mean?

Economy of fuels relies heavily on how they are produced. So depending on the precursors, efficiency or reactions, purification steps, etc. it could be good or total waste of time.

[–] • 0 pt

Butanol has more energy than methanol or ethanol, it has lower volatility and vapor pressure and mixes well with gasoline or diesel. The problem is cost of production, however that didn't stop ethanol, so government subsidies could potentially make it a viable fuel.

The economic considerations and production costs are the only thing that's stopping it from outright replacing gasoline or ethanol.

I thought you knew this.

[–] • 1 pt

EVERYTHING is fake and gay, welcome to 2021

Load more (11 replies)