WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

794

“It's our position that everyone may use their freedom of speech for any purpose except to limit others' freedom of speech.”

How does this square with someone commenting then blocking replys?

Is the right of reply not part of free speech?

“It's our position that everyone may use their freedom of speech for any purpose except to limit others' freedom of speech.” How does this square with someone commenting then blocking replys? Is the right of reply not part of free speech?

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Right to free speech does not equate to the right to force others to listen

[–] 1 pt

What ever happened to if you don't like what you're listening to, change the station?

[–] 1 pt

Am I censoring CNN by turning off CNN?

The way blocking was, you'd have to seek out their comments to know they exist. That's not forcing you to acknowledge them. Now they can't make comments at all.

[–] 1 pt

I'd say no, but you're a white supremacist and domestic terrorist if you turn on Fox!

[–] 1 pt

So we all just sit round with our fingers in our ears shouting ‘LALALALALALALA!’ instead of discussing, and using reasoned argument and facts?

[–] 0 pt

What about someone so resoundingly retarded that they refuse to do that?

The guy who goes NUH UH YOURE WRONG no matter what you do or say? Im not going to keep indulging retards. They can waste their own time, but I won’t have them waste mine.

[–] 2 pts

Well, you can be a big boy and make them look bad, or you're free to ignore them...

[–] 2 pts

You can make your point, then if the other party is not making sense you can leave the discussion and move on. Others will be able to read the thread later and make up their own minds, and pick up the discussion if they feel they can advance the discussion.