I think that's one of the big downsides of blockchain, the automated quorum allows CP and other bullshit to sink in.
I've been pondering the idea for a while: If poal, for example, had an approval system that was crowd sourced, you could require submissions to have X number of approved voters. Voters could have a public record, and voters who vote for shit like CP could have their voting rights suspended.
Voting to allow legal content in could add voting power, voting to add illegal content could result in an outright ban.
Posting new content could require perhaps a set number of successful votes for new posters.
Similar tactics could be employed to allow new blocks onto blockchains, preventing some level of abuse from spammers, the glow niggers, etc.
I really like Zeronet because it doesn't require much infrastructure or hosting costs. If a dedicated site is made there some thought into these types of rules should be put in. The site I made is text only because I didn't want to have to moderate the site from that type of thing. I started using it after 8chan got taken down and after Voat went down it seemed like the best place to create a permanent bunker.
I'll have to check it out.
I wish I had more time to do shit, everything in life closes in quick and suddenly you find yourself old and without time, scrambling to do things you should have already done.
I know that feeling, if you want to check it out follow that link to my site, there's a section that say "Getting Started" with links to the blocklist and tracker list.
(post is archived)