Actually OP is correct based on science studies. Tufts University did a infamous science study on this in the 1980s. The OP is correct. There is a profound correlation between high IQ females and less secondary sexual characteristics (buttock size, hip waist ratio, and of course breast size) For example, if you visit the campus of CalTech or MIT all the genetic females are very plain or masculine looking and flat chested. Tufts university proved this correlation with not only IQ (genetic based), but INCOME (also genetic correlated via IQ). Poor family girls are curvier by far. There is no question. If tolerating latino mestizo skin in your study and including all Caucasians and all Mestizos... generally, not counting nordic blonde blue eyes, VENEZUELAN very curvy voluptuous females win most beauty contests, if mostly european face features. BIGGER breasts in Venezuelan, more curves than a Nordic beauty queen. There are physiological, not cultural, reasons that the CalTech and MIT genetic females are not curvy and flat chested, even if not asian... its because they had far less hormones affect their puberty, went through puberty later (like a male), and were further masculinized as a fetus in the womb via being a non-identical twin, with a brother twin sharing the uterus at the time. Other factors can masculinize a female and finger length millimeter deviation measurements are the quickest way to measure masculinization in caucasian females : https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11910785/ summary : The ratio length of a womans index finger to the ring finger indicates brain and body masculinization and chance of either lesbianize or lack of desire to pair with a male. Many similar science studies. Masculinized females make more money, but their genetic offspring, if they ever exist, are also more masculinized and less curvy.