WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

(post is archived)

[–] 10 pts

because their mothers chose their fathers based solely on looks

richer mothers fucked those same Chads, but were a bit embarassed to bring back dumb vulgar Chad to their parents and end up partnering with someone a bit more well mannered, who being more professional makes more money, but is uglier.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

That is a surprisingly intelligent answer. Good looking bad boys get a lot of pussy.

[–] 0 pt

Damn, this guy nailed it like a richer mother.

[–] 0 pt

So the corollary would be if you want to fuck hot chicks, learn how to deal with women with daddy and abandonment issues

[–] 4 pts

I would rather take a 6/7/8 that’s not a moron than a 10 bimbo high maintenance bitch any day.

[–] 2 pts

I can go with a 3-4 intelligent broad than a 10 dumbass.

[–] 2 pts

I only see 3/4 as fatties, so no. 5 is my minimum.

[–] 0 pt

But that's a false dichotomy. In fact if they're smart, they're smart enough to take good care of themselves and be as attractive as possible because of the benefits it gets them. Ugly people are generally stupid.

[–] 2 pts (edited )

Attractive or Hot? Some women are very attractive but not hot and some hot women are not attractive. The best thing to do is strip them naked, take off all their fakeness like wigs, makeup, jewelry, give them a general aptitude test and then decide. It's sometimes eye opening what's hiding under all that.

[–] 6 pts

Take them to the beach or the water park or the pool or white water rafting.

See what they look like without all of the makeup, attire & hairdo.

[+] [deleted] 2 pts
[–] 2 pts

Wealthy girls have more opportunity to party and fuck at a much younger. Alcohol, drugs, and sex tend to age a person.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Um, I don't think that's true.

I mean I think there could definitely be some confirmation bias here. LOTS of chicks who grew up poor have 3 babies by 22 and end up looking like a Grandma (and quite possibly being one) by 30.

I'm not saying you couldn't be right, but I am saying that better off chicks grow up taking care of their bodies better, so I think it stands to reason that the opposite of what you say would be true.

[–] 1 pt

I think you are seeing what you want to see. Rich gurls have access to better food and medical/dental care. Who is 'hotter', a girl raised in Burbank, or a girl raised in Bangladesh?

[+] [deleted] 1 pt
[–] 1 pt

It only seems that way because so few hot women will have anything to do with you, and because you completely ignore the ugly women who grew up poor.

[–] 0 pt

Actually OP is correct based on science studies.

Tufts University did a infamous science study on this in the 1980s. The OP is correct.

There is a profound correlation between high IQ females and less secondary sexual characteristics (buttock size, hip waist ratio, and of course breast size)

For example, if you visit the campus of CalTech or MIT all the genetic females are very plain or masculine looking and flat chested.

Tufts university proved this correlation with not only IQ (genetic based), but INCOME (also genetic correlated via IQ).

Poor family girls are curvier by far. There is no question.

If tolerating latino mestizo skin in your study and including all Caucasians and all Mestizos... generally, not counting nordic blonde blue eyes, VENEZUELAN very curvy voluptuous females win most beauty contests, if mostly european face features.

BIGGER breasts in Venezuelan, more curves than a Nordic beauty queen.

There are physiological, not cultural, reasons that the CalTech and MIT genetic females are not curvy and flat chested, even if not asian... its because they had far less hormones affect their puberty, went through puberty later (like a male), and were further masculinized as a fetus in the womb via being a non-identical twin, with a brother twin sharing the uterus at the time. Other factors can masculinize a female and finger length millimeter deviation measurements are the quickest way to measure masculinization in caucasian females : https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11910785/

summary : The ratio length of a womans index finger to the ring finger indicates brain and body masculinization and chance of either lesbianize or lack of desire to pair with a male. Many similar science studies. Masculinized females make more money, but their genetic offspring, if they ever exist, are also more masculinized and less curvy.

[–] 0 pt

trying to appeal to authority in a thread about op's anecdote relating to pretty girls that he noticed

I lol'd pretty hard. You realize those studies only exist to help lazy and horny grad students meet underclassman girls, don't you?

[–] 1 pt

Honestly, it’s been my experience that it has everything to do with the people you are around. And, in general, people that live near beaches or in warmer climates, tend to be more attractive. As luck would have it, the “smart” colleges are in the NE ... where the bar is just a lot lower than the South. And as far as aging well, humidity helps, but sadly I believe it’s mostly genes. Just my opinion!

[–] 1 pt

I grew up very poor, and saw plenty of ugly women. I've lived in middle class areas for much of my adult life, and although there are still plenty of fatties and goblins, it seems like there's fewer. There's certainly more gym bunnies and fewer girls who look like drug addicts in this economic sphere.

Of course, that's just my experience, and I can't give you exact data for this. But if I had to guess why you notice more hot poor girls and ugly rich girls, I'd guess confirmation bias.

[–] 1 pt

lol..no. Poorer "chicks" are not hotter on average.

You're confused into thinking that those wealthier "chicks" are ugly just because they have an extra 190 lbs on their frame.

I'd suggest an evolutionary element. Girls with fewer resources are more attractive to get the attention of men with greater resources. Experiment: Take a look at the hottest wives in America. Correlate their hotness with the amount of money their husbands make.

Load more (8 replies)