Maybe a limit of a few downvoats per day to discourage abuse
Or if you downvoat you must give a reason in the comment box, i.e. 'massive faggotry'...'suspected jew bastid', etc.
and if the site was flooded with downvoates then the character of the users is clearly seen. whereas with upvoats people can get away with more farming and sliding easier/less'detection'
This. I liked the downvote, as I could save time by skipping topics I may not have been interested in, by noting the ratio of downvotes to upvotes. 15 upvotes doesn't mean it's a popular/well-written post, if there's 20 downvotes. But when in Rome............... I'm grateful for Poal for letting us in.
I find Poalsters don't use the upvote to the degree that Voatsters did.
there hasnt been much abuse of the downvoat. it is the upvoat that has been misused faar more.
(post is archived)