Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

792

I'm against censorship but the jews most powerful weapon must go we don't need any fucking porn on here and the downvotes I've see. Justify it

Stop masterbaiting stop watching porn get out of debt don't play the jew games

I'm against censorship but the jews most powerful weapon must go we don't need any fucking porn on here and the downvotes I've see. Justify it Stop masterbaiting stop watching porn get out of debt don't play the jew games

(post is archived)

[–] • 23 pts

Sub of the day is random, hon. The good news is your allowed to post anti-porn posts there.

[–] • 26 pts

I’d like to see your dick please

[–] [deleted] • 18 pts

I admire your consistency Saint.

[–] • 19 pts

It’s like fishing. You gotta have patience and toss out a lot of lines

[–] • 9 pts

He was exactly the same on Voat.

It's all so tiresome.

[–] • 2 pts

You should at least go on a few dates with someone before asking them something so lewd.

[–] • 10 pts

Or maybe you could just do it now and save me buying a meal.

[–] • 2 pts

homosexuals serve no purpose and should be terminated immediately.

[–] • 9 pts (edited )

homosexuals do serve a purpose, just one that you dont want them fullfilling.

  • tend to also be pedos and trannies, thus weakening the host nation susceptibility to kike propaganda.

  • spread diseases that cannot be cured and need expensive pills every day to feel normal or not die, this allowing the kike to tax existence, and hard.

[–] • 2 pts

Send a PM to @picman. He's got a much bigger collection than you'll ever wish for.

[–] • 3 pts

He turned me down :( after you got my hopes up

[–] • 1 pt

Gasp The legend himself.

[–] • 2 pts

People Think it’s funny but at first they hated me. I don’t care either way. I’m just trying

[–] • 0 pt

You weren't nearly that polite when you asked me on Voat!

[–] • 3 pts

Good opportunity for some redpilling, I'd say.

[–] • 4 pts

Only the dedicated and disciplined can fap one off through an anti-fapper rant. It's A CHALLENGE!

[–] • 0 pt

I've fapped one off with memories of grandma still fresh in my mind as the cat sat there and stared at my work. Don't challenge me.

[–] • 0 pt

Nigger ... I broke my teeth on /b/ in its heyday. This ain't shit.

[–] • 1 pt

Front hole or GTFO!

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Tits or gtfo

[–] • 0 pt

What a dazzling offer.

[–] • 0 pt

It's not an offer, just more of a statement.

[–] • 0 pt

show feet

[–] • 2 pts

You sick freak

You probably only fuck your christian wife in the missionary position for the sole purpose of procreation

[–] • 0 pt

the sole purpose of procreation

uh...honestly confused...what other purpose would it have?

[–] • 0 pt

What about bob or vagene?

[–] • 1 pt

feet plz

[–] • 0 pt

Ok Hon you faggot..

I'm against censorship but fucking porn if it gets accidently on the sun of the day maybe @aou could be a good mod and just knock that shit out of the park! Only people who would complain are jews faggots and gamma or pedophile sick fucks

[–] • 1 pt

I'm not fond of porn myself, so I'm confused about how I've ruffled your feathers.

[–] • 1 pt

I thinknthe entire thread got me pissed. We on the same side probably...

Hon reminds me when some one calls you kid just didn't like the sound of thwt

[–] • 7 pts

I'm against censorship but

[–] • 4 pts

imagine thinking what the jew spews out of it's mouth should be considered equal speech lmfao

[–] • 0 pt

You may be a "suspicious" account, but broken clocks and all that. Have an updoot.

[–] • 0 pt

you get one too :P

for note, I downvoted an AOU comment, didn't post anything and 10 minutes later had a sus behavior tag, i'll wear it with pride :)

[–] • 3 pts

What way to better show how pro first amendment you are than by posting your dick pics. So go ahead. Unless....you’re not a hypocrite are you?

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, but it's the second amendment I need to cover the heat I'm packing.

edit: No, sorry, not sending pics.

[–] • 0 pt

Imagine wanting to see some random dude's dick pics.

[–] • 4 pts

Tell me about it. Once upon a time in high school I was hanging out with one of my buddies. Smoking weed, drinking beer, watching football. Typical Sunday. Then out of nowhere I got a really strong urge to suck his dick. I try to fight it but you cant

[–] • 1 pt

Once heard anything said before a but is to be discarded.

[–] • 2 pts

Same here. I am in favor of "______," but.

I typically ignore everything before the "but."

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt (edited )

I'm not against censorship. Jewish, cultural marxist filth should be censored.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I'm libertarian. I want smaller government. Of course the logical, theoretical end would be NO government. But I don't want that.

Likewise, I suppose few of us are against ALL censorship. We just believe in less censorship. Will let you know when our speech is so free that we can't take it anymore.

[–] • 2 pts

I consider myself a small-L libertarian in the sense that I don't agree with the Libertarian party enough to join. I'm also for as limited a government as we can get away with, as well as the most speech as possible. Speech that doesn't harm consenting adults is usually where I draw the line.

[–] • 1 pt

I'm curious, what would you consider speech that harms an adult?

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Sure. I hesitate to assume... you're not suggesting that porn doesn't harm consenting adults, are you? The destructive and perverse nature of porn seems self-evident, but maybe I'm just a prude.

[–] • 0 pt

Amen, brother. There's a limit ... "FIRE" in a crowded movie house and what not ... same with child porn. SOME government is needed.

Yes, communes can self-govern and what-not ... but when you look at most communes ... the leader is often very cult-leaderish and it comes out that he fucks the kids ... so take that for what you will.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

Professor__de__la_Paz

Nice. A fellow man of culture. How's it going Bernardo?

[–] • 1 pt

I sure would rather be sitting in a pub on Luna than where I am right now, but fine otherwise. And you?

[–] • 1 pt

In a pub on Monday?

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

I like breathing real air but I support to loonies. TANSTAAFL!

[–] • 7 pts

Because this isn't a Christian website. It's liberal in the classic sense. Anything is allowed.

[–] • 5 pts (edited )

non-religious rebuttal: porn attracts dishonest people and needlessly endangers the websites hosting. it absolutely should not be allowed. go to one of the infinite sites that exist solely for that purpse instead of you wanna coom so badly.

[–] • 4 pts

I, too, am against censorship except for things I don't like.

[–] • 2 pts

no, your purity spiraling, which is less useful than tits on a clam

[–] • 0 pt

OR - you could fuck off to a site that suits you instead of trying to force your bullshit onto everyone here... just a thought..

[–] • 2 pts

you talk like someone waiting for a good time to post CP

[–] • 0 pt

Bro. I'm agnostic (I consider myself culturally Christian tho) and I believe the porn industry must be dismantled. They send out guys to high school parties to scout talent to groom. So when they hit 18 they are ready to go.

[–] [deleted] • 7 pts

Why are you not praising the fact that even though there is a porn sub, it has a total of 2 posts.

One asking if porn is ok to post and another discussing Jewish roles in the porn industry.

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts (edited )

another discussing Jewish roles in the porn industry.

Really, this is what that sub should be about.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

If one were to judge by its conent, it is. Lets keep it that way.

[–] • 6 pts

The jew wants White men to be enslaved, whether by porn, drugs, TV, alcohol, sports...do NOT feed the jew...be strong, and make your ancestors proud...they are watching, and judging.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

oy vey goyim, click on it and start jerking your mutilated penis.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

fucking degenerate kikes strike again. wish those disease ridden mofo's would just die out.

[–] • 2 pts

Porn is poison. It warps you mentally and spiritually.

[–] • 1 pt

If you don’t like it then post articles about how porn is bad in the porn sub.

[–] • 1 pt

That would be as rude, and as effective, as posting Satanic verses in a Christianity sub. No one is going to care but other heathens.

[–] • 2 pts

You might have a point except I don't think there's anyone who comes to this website for the sake of looking at porn.

[–] • 2 pts

What is Q but political porn?

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

You telling me what to do tells me all I need to know about you leading me. Won't happen while I'm alive.

[–] • 1 pt

I’ll lead you honey buns. Well have a penguin farm together

[–] • 0 pt

Just a suggestion stop mastebaiting to other men fucjing trafficket mentally abused women who are tricked into by jews.. you are making your self worse while making jews rich and ruining white women's lives..

But I guess don't listen to me you faggot gamma keep jerking off while staring at another man's dick if you want you weak bitch

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

I think that sub is mainly used for talking about the addiction of porn, and how bad it is-I think

I saw that too, went there and some nigger is posting under age girls.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

that shite needs to be banned and removed.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

We went through this same debacle at Voat a few weeks before the site was closed. I made the best argument I could at the time, agreeing with your comment above. I have to be honest though, and I don't like to admit I'm wrong, but I think I was beaten.

Now, here's the caveat. You could downvote at Voat. That's trickier here, and seems to be up to mod discretion whether or not your downvotes were justified, i.e. whether the content you downvoted was actually 'spam'.

If you have the ability to downvote, that takes care of the porn problem. People can simply block the sub, and/or downvote the content into oblivion, at the same time communicating the group consensus that said content is unwanted. Now you at least have a means of punishing the user account that's posting the unwanted content.

That's not as easy here. If this site is going to truly be a 'free speech' site in the classical liberal sense everyone in this thread is saying it is, then that necessarily means every user must have the ability to voice disagreement. You short-circuit that by only allowing downvoting to indicate 'spam'. The best we can currently do at Poal is to not 'show love' and let the unwanted content sit at 0, which at best just indicates neutrality.

The heart of the problem, as I see it, is that we are being told to distinguish agreement and disagreement in terms of two different substances. We agree quantitatively, but we must disagree qualitatively. We measure agreement, we only talk about disagreement. I think the discrepancy becomes clear in the case of porn. Is anyone in a porn sub going to be inclined to read or respond to your verbal arguments? Come on, let's be realistic. For verbal disagreement to work, you've got to have a discourse. This is why we need to figure out a way to make disagreeing quantitative here imo.

Load more (27 replies)