I have heard people complain about Asians controlling business in Uganda - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-36132151 I'm not gaslighting or making a false equivalence - I'm drawing a direct comparison between blaming all jews for the actions of a minority and blaming all whites for the actions of a minority. A good example would be slavery in the US where a tiny fraction of whites were involved in it (don't blame it all on jews I know you want to!) And the vast majority fought to stop it. In the modern interpretation all whites are considered guilty and hear calls for reparations. If you think that is unfair then we are arguing on the same side. Should all gays have to pay reparations for HIV? Should all jews have to pay reparations for communism? My point is that (apart from being factually untrue) lumping all jews together doesn't leave any room for effective action, it just weakens whatever point your arguing. Take the hedge fund thing at the moment. There is opportunity for real change and beneficial outcomes, but if it gets turned into a jew blaming fest then it makes it easier for the guilty parties to hide behind that. There are hedge funds run by Jews and Asians and Anglos and even Africans, all guilty of the same tricks.