Unsubstantiated and extremely unlikely.
A trickle is required unless you want it dismissed. Zero exceptions, if you want people to know it must be trickle fed. Simply how cognitive bias works. Especially in a judeo-msm controlled environment.
A trickle is required unless you want it dismissed.
And how many people do you know who did not dismiss QAnon ? As far as I can tell, the vast majority of people rejected it, for one reason or another.
Reality is, only 20% across the bell curve are capable of thinking outside the box (introspection, inner voice, critical thought). Everyone else will simply follow. Thus the abundance of useful idiots here, even among the supposed woke.
You just validated my position. Thus the significance that normies are using the talking points because they are true, not because they came from Q or anons.
You just validated my position.
Validating your position isn’t the same as agreeing with it, and certainly not substantiating it.
Q was a limited hangout and a PsyOp, and most likely a LARP and a cult as well. Your argument that Q deserves the credit for it,
Q and anons have awakening 100s of millions globally. Millions more were using Q or anon talking points without realizing.
I’m not saying it’s invalid, I’m saying it’s misleading. Giving Q the credit for that is taking credit away from the so-called “conspiracy theorists” who had been saying these things for decades, and people refused to listen.
They dismissed the Truth, until it was released in a controlled manner. That’s what Q was - controlled release.
(post is archived)