WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

643

The markets are retarded. Dogecoin seems retarded. Sounds like they'll go well together. It's up 140% over past few days.

The markets are retarded. Dogecoin seems retarded. Sounds like they'll go well together. It's up 140% over past few days.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

Yea I started reading that...then pretty quickly it starts talking about mutilating babies. So no thanks.

[–] 0 pt

Lying is one of the things it tends to warn about mate.

Am I lying?

[–] 0 pt

With every breath

[–] 0 pt (edited )

He's referring to circumcision, but is confused by the radically more invasive 'circumcision' today, which is based on the Jewish peri'ah method from the much far less invasive biblical circumcision. The Jewish peri'ah method is actually what is performed in hospitals today for all those unfortunate enough to be conned into this mutilation. The history of circumcision is not a Christian one. From the first century on, Christians took a strong stand against circumcision. Christians rejected circumcision at the Council at Jerusalem (Acts 15). St. Paul, the apostle to the gentiles, taught parents that they should not circumcise their children (Acts 21:25). In a reference to the old practices of genital mutilation, St. Paul warned Titus to beware of the "circumcision group." I'll explain this a little later. The history of circumcision is controversial in the bible and again is not in anyway the same that's practiced today.

The circumcision of Abraham removed only the very tip that extended beyond the glans penis. Moses and his sons were not circumcised. (Exodus 4:25) Although Moses apparently prohibited circumcision during the 40 years in the wilderness, (Joshua 5:5) Joshua reinstituted circumcision at Gilgal after the death of Moses. (Joshua 5:2-10) It is interesting to note that after the Israelites were circumcised, they immediately became soldiers in Joshua's army for the conquest of Palestine. (Joshua 6:1-3). This suggests circumcision was used in the least to differentiate soldiers from the enemy.

In contrast to the Jews, the Greeks and the Romans placed a high value on the prepuce. The Romans passed several laws prohibiting circumcision. The laws were applied to everyone and were not directed against the Jews.

Much later in the Hellenic period, about 140 C.E., the Jewish authorities modified circumcision procedure to make it impossible for a Jew to appear to be an uncircumcised Greek. A radical new procedure called peri'ah was introduced by the priests and rabbis. In this procedure the foreskin was stripped away from the glans, with which it is fused in the infant. In a painful procedure known today as a synechotomy, more foreskin was removed than before and the injury was correspondingly greater. With the introduction of peri'ah, the glans could not easily be recovered, and so no Jewish male would easily be able to appear as an uncircumcised Greek. This radical modified procedure eventually was adopted by the medical profession and is the circumcision operation used today.

[–] 0 pt

The reality is he was lying by saying he started to read the bible and then closed it in disgust when he got to the circumcision.

Edgelords gonna edgelord.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

God is just as responsible for the common practice of baby mutilation, as the kikes that actually perform them. God is all knowing right...so he would have known what those versus in the bible would lead to. And any amount of baby mutilation is bad...to say oh well it was just the tip back then is retarded. Its mutilation.

...assuming you believe the bible is actually God's word

[–] 0 pt

ive been looking for this amazing talk done by this guy claiming that circumcision is ritual blood sacrifice. most eloquent speakers ive ever heard. but i cant find it anywhere. sadge. got any idea?