Lying is one of the things it tends to warn about mate.
Am I lying?
With every breath
You're retarded. What specifically did I lie about.
He's referring to circumcision, but is confused by the radically more invasive 'circumcision' today, which is based on the Jewish peri'ah method from the much far less invasive biblical circumcision. The Jewish peri'ah method is actually what is performed in hospitals today for all those unfortunate enough to be conned into this mutilation. The history of circumcision is not a Christian one. From the first century on, Christians took a strong stand against circumcision. Christians rejected circumcision at the Council at Jerusalem (Acts 15). St. Paul, the apostle to the gentiles, taught parents that they should not circumcise their children (Acts 21:25). In a reference to the old practices of genital mutilation, St. Paul warned Titus to beware of the "circumcision group." I'll explain this a little later. The history of circumcision is controversial in the bible and again is not in anyway the same that's practiced today.
The circumcision of Abraham removed only the very tip that extended beyond the glans penis. Moses and his sons were not circumcised. (Exodus 4:25) Although Moses apparently prohibited circumcision during the 40 years in the wilderness, (Joshua 5:5) Joshua reinstituted circumcision at Gilgal after the death of Moses. (Joshua 5:2-10) It is interesting to note that after the Israelites were circumcised, they immediately became soldiers in Joshua's army for the conquest of Palestine. (Joshua 6:1-3). This suggests circumcision was used in the least to differentiate soldiers from the enemy.
In contrast to the Jews, the Greeks and the Romans placed a high value on the prepuce. The Romans passed several laws prohibiting circumcision. The laws were applied to everyone and were not directed against the Jews.
Much later in the Hellenic period, about 140 C.E., the Jewish authorities modified circumcision procedure to make it impossible for a Jew to appear to be an uncircumcised Greek. A radical new procedure called peri'ah was introduced by the priests and rabbis. In this procedure the foreskin was stripped away from the glans, with which it is fused in the infant. In a painful procedure known today as a synechotomy, more foreskin was removed than before and the injury was correspondingly greater. With the introduction of peri'ah, the glans could not easily be recovered, and so no Jewish male would easily be able to appear as an uncircumcised Greek. This radical modified procedure eventually was adopted by the medical profession and is the circumcision operation used today.
The reality is he was lying by saying he started to read the bible and then closed it in disgust when he got to the circumcision.
Edgelords gonna edgelord.
Got it. It's more of the same claim of Christians practicing Jewish occult practices. Christians didn't circumcise their children in America until within the last 75 years. The 'lobby' promoting it was based on the ridiculous claim of preventing masturbation. After several studies were publicized concluding circumcision was medically unnecessary, starting in 1983, Thomas Wiswell, M.D. (Wiswell is a common Jewish surname) began to produce a series of egregiously flawed studies that claimed circumcision reduced the incidence of urinary tract infections. The reasoning switched from the 75 year claim of preventing masturbation to preventing urinary infections. All of Wiswell’s studies have long since been thoroughly discredited.
I got a bible right next to my bed, you faggot
God is just as responsible for the common practice of baby mutilation, as the kikes that actually perform them. God is all knowing right...so he would have known what those versus in the bible would lead to. And any amount of baby mutilation is bad...to say oh well it was just the tip back then is retarded. Its mutilation.
...assuming you believe the bible is actually God's word
>"God is just as responsible for the common practice of baby mutilation,..."
LOL. 'Flabbygasted' is judging God Himself. It amazes that some people actually believe they are all-knowledgeable. Circumcision is not a Christian practice.
ive been looking for this amazing talk done by this guy claiming that circumcision is ritual blood sacrifice. most eloquent speakers ive ever heard. but i cant find it anywhere. sadge. got any idea?
No, not really. It is easy to come to this conclusion if you know about rites. You're referring to the third stage of ritual circumcision, the Messisa or Metzitzah, was not introduced until the Talmudic period (500-625 C.E).In Metzitzah, the mohel (ritual circumciser) sucks blood from the penis of the circumcised infant with his mouth. This procedure has been responsible for the death of many Jewish babies due to infection.
There's more.... far more.
(post is archived)