WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

203

The markets are retarded. Dogecoin seems retarded. Sounds like they'll go well together. It's up 140% over past few days.

The markets are retarded. Dogecoin seems retarded. Sounds like they'll go well together. It's up 140% over past few days.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I addressed this verse earlier. For one thing, it was most certainly NOT anything like the invasive practice of the Jewish peri'ah used today on children adopted by the medical profession. Yes, the medical profession adopted this butchery. The peri'ah appears in Greece in Jewish communities in AD. This same butchery in Judaism was said to be necessary to prevent masturbation and the 20th Century medical profession (during Sigmund Freud's time) believed this BS.

Nevertheless, the *peri'ah was so brutally 'invasive Jews offered several methods of foreskin restoration to the victims. It may have been at this time that the Pondus Judaeus (also known as Judaeum Pondum), a bronze weight worn by Jews on the residual foreskin to stretch it back into a foreskin, gained popularity amongst Jewish males. This lessened the ugly appearance of the bare exposed circumcised penis. This restorative procedure was known by the Greek word epispasm, or "rolling inward." (create problem, pay for solution).

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

So which are you defending...kikes because their way "wasnt as barbaric" or god? If you're defending kikes thats fucking stupid...as far as god, all I'm saying is if the bible, which is what the person in the first response was talking about, is a true representation of gods word, then god himself is a dirty kike and should fuck off. I'm not worried about literal translations in Greek and Latin and shit...because honestly, none of us know what exactly was written down based on gods word, I'm just saying, IF god actually told his followers to slice up baby parts, regardless of how much smoother it was back the (like you have any fucking clue...sure I bet there was NEVER any mishaps with their ancient tools) then God is a dirty kike.

[–] 0 pt

Not quite. You're using one of the classic 5 major falsehoods, in which Jews work to conceal their nature and protect their status and power, to wit: (1) The Jews are Israelites, and thus God's chosen people; (2) Jesus Christ was a Jew; (3) That 6 million Jews were killed in a holocaust during WW II; (4) That all people are equal; and, (5) That the Jews are just another religious group.

Christianity has NEVER been based on Judaism. In fact Judaism is a newer religion than Christianity is. Judaism was created to confront the spread of Christianity and also to conceal Judaism's ritualistic practice of blood-letting.

In 66 CE, when the Roman general Vespasian swept into Jerusalem, Judaism was a cultic, oral religion, with Herod's massive temple as its lodestar. Everything happened in the temple complex. Four years later, Vespasian's son Titus razed it to the ground. A quote from the Talmud: "Where was God under the rubble?" wondered the Rabbis. "How to praise him now that the temple was gone?" The sages agreed: Jews would have to BECOME a people of the book, or they would disappear. Hence, they were NOT a people of the book before this time.

Circumcision did not exist in Christianity for 2000 years. It is still not the prevailing practice in Christianity. The apostle Paul explicitly denounced the practice, rejecting and condemning those who promoted circumcision to Christians. Paul warned that the advocates of circumcision were "false brothers". In addition, Greek and Roman culture found circumcision to be detestable and inhumane. In the Roman Empire, circumcision was regarded as a barbaric and a repugnant custom. The consul Titus Flavius Clemens was condemned to death by the Roman Senate in 95 CE for, according to the Talmud, circumcising himself and converting to Judaism. The Emperor Hadrian (117–138) forbade circumcision. From this, it is quite clear that circumcision is NOT a Western or Christian practice.

The origins of circumcision is not clear. It certainly precedes Abraham. In fact, eastern tribes of the Mesopotamia did not practice circumcision. These tribes included the Canaanites. Western tribes like the Edomites did however practice it. During this period, circumcision was, among other reasons, a mark to separate people from other tribes. There was also a religious aspect to this that appears to represent a blood sacrificial offering. We certainly can see this today with Jewish ritual circumcision, the Messisa or Metzitzah, in which a mohel (ritual circumciser) sucks blood from the penis of the circumcised infant with his mouth. This is NOT Christianity, nor has it ever been. Circumcision has NEVER been a practice in Christianity.

>"I'm not worried about literal translations in Greek and Latin and shit..."

Your statement sums up your slacker attitude for seeking the truth. As a result, one tends to fall for the Judaizing myths and precepts of the eternal enemy.

I dont refer to people from israel as kikes...I consider people that perform or support child mutilation as kikes. You can be from Israel and not be a kike, and you can be a catholic in Kansas and be a kike. Maybe I should have clarified that before...I dont care if someone came from the middle east. I just care if they are a dirty kike.

I feel like you are trying to go way too deep into the topic, trying to sound like a genius scholar, when what I'm saying is very simple. Kikes torture babies, if the words in the bible are actually gods words, he is a kike. Simple as that.