Explain your rejection of a relevant argument, I predict you will fail at this request and provide a low effort selection from a list of logical fallacies.
What point are you presenting for me to argue against or discuss?
This particular gas chamber is used in capital execution
I did notice that you avoided a logical-fallacy by not actually addressing my question of why you dismissed an argument relevant to the question, still waiting.
That gas chamber is used for an execution where a person, one person, knows they are going to be executed.
I can't believe you would think that is pertinent to a discussion about something that was said to be a shower and covertly used to execute large groups of people.
Honestly some of you guys are just such basic thinkers. You're honestly incapable of proper analytical thought.
(post is archived)