WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

656

It gradually built up to be a constant subject in the news, peaking with the burning of the towers in the UK.. and now that it should be getting properly rolled out and prepared.. all talk of it seems to have disappeared?

It gradually built up to be a constant subject in the news, peaking with the burning of the towers in the UK.. and now that it should be getting properly rolled out and prepared.. all talk of it seems to have disappeared?

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I hope for an incompatible patchwork, so nobody can observe us 100% 360° 24/7 no more.

[–] 2 pts (edited )

You know the GCP dot?

Measuring "consciousness' effect on random number generators on a global scale"?

I wonder if what they're measuring is actually the effects of big ass distributed exploit networks (hardware level) used for cyberwarfare. Any time the NSA or other wants to say, commit a mass DDOS (like was done for the wikileaks deadmans switch), or other cyber attack, they flip a switch and millions of backdoored devices switch to a low-entropy mode in their random number generators, effectively making it trivial, with a certain method only known to them, to break https or other protocols while the system is active.

Clearly speculation of course.

But if I were running the NSA or u.s. cybercommand, why go through the bother of designing carefully crafted elliptic curve algorithms that are breakable as a one-off, when I could do that to the entire fucking industry?

It would be the difference between having a single nuclear weapon and an arsenal of cyber 'nuclear weapons'.

Also explains the distributed mass cyberwarfare.

Why run a big ass expensive network thats vulnerable to being hacked or traced back to you when you can simply co-opt a significant chunk of internet infrastructure and connected devices to do your dirtywork instead?