WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

378

It gradually built up to be a constant subject in the news, peaking with the burning of the towers in the UK.. and now that it should be getting properly rolled out and prepared.. all talk of it seems to have disappeared?

It gradually built up to be a constant subject in the news, peaking with the burning of the towers in the UK.. and now that it should be getting properly rolled out and prepared.. all talk of it seems to have disappeared?

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts

The 5G rumors were seeded to stop Huawei from replacing the worldwide NSA infrastructure. They were successful and aren't needed no more.

[–] 2 pts

seeded to stop Huawei from replacing the worldwide NSA infrastructure.

Seeded to stop Beijing from replacing the worldwide NSA infrastructure with its own.

Fixed.

[–] 1 pt

I hope for an incompatible patchwork, so nobody can observe us 100% 360° 24/7 no more.

[–] 2 pts (edited )

You know the GCP dot?

Measuring "consciousness' effect on random number generators on a global scale"?

I wonder if what they're measuring is actually the effects of big ass distributed exploit networks (hardware level) used for cyberwarfare. Any time the NSA or other wants to say, commit a mass DDOS (like was done for the wikileaks deadmans switch), or other cyber attack, they flip a switch and millions of backdoored devices switch to a low-entropy mode in their random number generators, effectively making it trivial, with a certain method only known to them, to break https or other protocols while the system is active.

Clearly speculation of course.

But if I were running the NSA or u.s. cybercommand, why go through the bother of designing carefully crafted elliptic curve algorithms that are breakable as a one-off, when I could do that to the entire fucking industry?

It would be the difference between having a single nuclear weapon and an arsenal of cyber 'nuclear weapons'.

Also explains the distributed mass cyberwarfare.

Why run a big ass expensive network thats vulnerable to being hacked or traced back to you when you can simply co-opt a significant chunk of internet infrastructure and connected devices to do your dirtywork instead?

[–] 2 pts

To close to the truth. The research on EMF is conisitent that ot adversely effects laboratory animals. It is not safe.

[–] 1 pt

Too busy, come back when its 6 or 7. Geez, can't you see what's going on? Busy, busy, busy.

[–] 0 pt

Watch the man from 3036 on tubi

[–] 0 pt

Cell towers are real cause for concern, potentially very harmful radiation, but I never understood why 5G triggered fears. Why not 4G too?

[–] 0 pt

4G doesn't use 60Ghz millimeter waves

[–] 0 pt

There's so much other shit going on it just got lost in the weeds.

[–] 0 pt

Redirected our focus with xiden