Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

I've used Startpage, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Gibiru, etc. - all of them are either shit or they just search Google/Bing on the backend and present you with the results for "privacy."

Why is it so nearly impossible for an independent company to put together their own search engine similar to Yahoo in the 90's? Hell, I would gladly take 1990's Yahoo technology today over the bells and whistles of propaganda Google and Bing today.

I just searched vaccine deaths on DuckDuckGo and it's nothing but "FACT CHECK" bullshit at the top. DuckDuckGo is absolute shit. What are the real alternatives? Are they all being murdered when they try to start up a search engine?

At this point Yandex seems to be the only search that isn't biased about US politics. But c'mon, we shouldn't have to use Kremlin search to be able to search the internet.

I've used Startpage, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Gibiru, etc. - all of them are either shit or they just search Google/Bing on the backend and present you with the results for "privacy." Why is it so nearly impossible for an independent company to put together their own search engine similar to Yahoo in the 90's? Hell, I would gladly take 1990's Yahoo technology today over the bells and whistles of propaganda Google and Bing today. I just searched vaccine deaths on DuckDuckGo and it's nothing but "FACT CHECK" bullshit at the top. DuckDuckGo is absolute shit. What are the real alternatives? Are they all being murdered when they try to start up a search engine? At this point Yandex seems to be the only search that isn't biased about US politics. But c'mon, we shouldn't have to use Kremlin search to be able to search the internet.

(post is archived)

[–] • 21 pts

Because Google and Bing buy up any competitor before they become a competitor.

[–] • 8 pts

Totally not a monopoly though.

[–] • 3 pts

Who declares monopolies and are they independent from them?

[–] • 10 pts

The DoJ is responsible for anti-trust cases, but it's mostly just a bribery system, or a political tool. There are probably a dozen+ anti-trust cases in the courts, but magically all of our major monopolies aren't being targeted. Werid that Trump had four years and big tech and big media didn't get touched that entire time. They all attacked him, yet he did nothing to break up their obvious monopolies and constant mergers/acquisitions. Weird...

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

Not entirely true. Muh stronk interdependent woman CEO Marissa Meyer (youtube.com) gutted yahoo for her buddies at jewgle. Absolutely ran it into the ground.

Most of the other competitors use the same "authoritative sources" algorithms as jewgle so they get similar results. OP is remembering with rose colored glasses the days when you'd search "big boob" and get a geocities page about how the holohoax is fake. Now they all weigh authoritative sources higher, who are authoritative sources? Well, .gov, .edu and .lügenpresse domains of course. Now because wikipedia is the authority on everything they always show up first. But lets be honost on anything non-political, such as bird migration patterns, you're going to get better info from kikepedia than from hotgaysex666.blogspot.com

[–] • 6 pts

That fucking whore. I worked on the same campus as yahoo, used to carpool with dude that was part of the sales force there.

Little by little, you could see it, then one day...poof. He was gone.

[–] • 2 pts

Don't be so quick to judge hotgaysex666.blogspot.com, there is a lot of good info on that site. You fags should definitely check it out

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Why is it an add for Netflix?

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

hotgaysex666.blogspot.com

what if the site is run by an actual ornithologist who just chose a really degenerate domain name?

Is a wikipedia editor powermodding while huffing butter, chewing foreskins, and rubbing coconut oil all over their fat pimpled fucking potbelly, really more accurate than a gay satanist ornithologist?

[–] • 1 pt

But why can't an open source one be made that no one can own, or everyone can own, with a penny investment. All proceeds go to promoting white interests and exposing zionists.

[–] • 0 pt

"open source one be made"
Code stolen by Google and modified just enough to be patented
Lawsuit

You could also make a closed source alternative to compete... but everyone has their price.

[–] • 1 pt

But if everyone owns it, no one owns it. If you make it to not profit, what or who would there be to sue.

Human minds are clever enough to address this. I wish I knew enough to try to poke it with a stick. If the chans can find a flag, people can do this.

[–] • 8 pts

i'm surprised people actually use DuckDuckJew. the ceo's last enterprise was selling user data

[–] • 2 pts

Its main page also features a negress scientist.

[–] • 1 pt

This jew & former In-Q-Tel (CIA) executive is on DuckDuckGo board of directors

https://www.alsop-louie.com/team/stephen-mendel/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-Q-Tel

He is the DuckDuckGo founder's uncle.

Uncle In-Q-Tel provided the start-up capital for DuckDuckGo.

The founder of DuckDuckGo is also married to the daughter of Gerald McCann, a former Democrat mayor of Jersey City who did time for bank fraud in the 1990s.

[–] • 7 pts

Yahoo and Askjeeves worked quite well for the time, also Lycos, Hotbot, Altavista and so on. The main reason why Google works so well today (as they did in 2000) is that they defend against search engine spam (sometimes called SEO) which made search engines basically useless when they were manipulated like fuck. Google does that very well, Bing isn't bad either. Duckduckgo is ok, but is not a very good search engine. There are other attempts at doing it, but this is like saying why does nobody make a drink that beats Coca Cola after a week, this just does not work.

Yandex is quite ok, but is based in russia, Chinese search engines do not work well for English text, there are no alternatives.

[–] • 2 pts

Lycos is still around and probably the last search engine not owned by one of the big companies or the government.

Also, Searx.me (searx.me) or searx.xyz (searx.xyz).

[–] • 0 pt

Getting a bunch of tired tripe from the Anglo-Zionist media is search engine spam.

[–] • 7 pts

The open source project Searx is coming along. Here is one of the better/stable instances:

https://search.mdosch.de

https://github.com/searx/searx

[–] • 4 pts

Very serendipitous, I just started researching setting up my own search stack. I'd like to give this a shot this week

[–] • 2 pts

I usually go with searx.xyz because its easier for most people.

[–] • 1 pt

Thanks, I'll check it out. Looks like I didn't get "fact checked" when I searched for something that's commonly censored just now.

[–] • 4 pts

Also grating is that Google/Bing are themselves craptastic search engines.

I too would go back to vintage Yahoo over this. Another example of the 1990s being infinitely superior to modern times, something that no one in the 1990s would have believed possible.

[–] • 3 pts

MetaCrawler was good back in the day. They had a feature called MetaSpy that let you watch searches in real time.

[–] • 2 pts

There were so many search engines in the 90s. Remember Alta Vista?

[–] • 0 pt

Most of the old portals are still active, just owned by Yahoo. So they're powered by Bing.

It seams Alta Vista now just redirects to Yahoo while hotbot is still going.

https://search.hotbot.com

What blows my mind is that Lycos is still its own search company.

https://www.lycos.com

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Everyone is too busy with your mom.

[–] • 1 pt

Had to scroll alllll the way to bottom for the actual answer.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Your question simplifies to: how can we dekike society at all levels.

:D

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

it's moderately complicated to index web pages for searching. the main issue is the sheer amount of data you'll be dealing with. the resources are expensive, so it has to be funded somehow.

startpage was just bought by some advertising company. it's sus

[–] • 0 pt

Check out SearX and I shit you not, Lycos.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

i use it sometimes. searx is an aggregator not a search engine on its own.

lycos has been around forever. do they censor or manipulate results?

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

There no money in a cure only prevention

Load more (18 replies)